[flagged]
So? Why do you think that should be impossible? How would you explain how geographically distant groups in radically different conditions could, over millennia, converge on all of the exact same non-visible traits…
The premise was more that we can say with near-certainty that there are non-visible genetic differences between the races without even knowing specifically what these traits are or the extent to which they have…
What does that mean? You reject natural selection as "storytime and not science"?
>You could tell the same story about the selective pressure for intelligence and problem-solving in hot climates You sure could! Why wouldn't you? Do you reject the concept of evolution via natural selection in all…
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
So? Why do you think that should be impossible? How would you explain how geographically distant groups in radically different conditions could, over millennia, converge on all of the exact same non-visible traits…
The premise was more that we can say with near-certainty that there are non-visible genetic differences between the races without even knowing specifically what these traits are or the extent to which they have…
What does that mean? You reject natural selection as "storytime and not science"?
>You could tell the same story about the selective pressure for intelligence and problem-solving in hot climates You sure could! Why wouldn't you? Do you reject the concept of evolution via natural selection in all…
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]