The WSJ editorial board is garbage and will fall over themselves to side with corporate America even if it means making untenable arguments.
Yep! But I don't think a ban is needed to remove cars. Just make it undesirable to have one. Remove incentives to drive. For example, removing parking (free parking especially) is a great way to remove cars.
The data disagrees. Narrowing streets, adding vertical elements to the edges of streets, and removing lanes works. Congestion pricing helps too!
Skip the red light camera phase and just start redesigning the streets so they don't invite speeding and dangerous driving. No amount of enforcement is ever going to stop assholes. Making them feel like they might hurt…
Purely subjective. I personally see no difference in the balance, and either way, "balanced" doesn't mean correct.
It's the giant SUVs. The answer is obvious just by walking around, but the data is an obvious correlation as well. Any car that you can't see a child out of should be illegal.
Flat, simple logo design has nothing to do with "going digital" - all the gradients and chrome shit layered on top of the existing logo are far more "digital" than anything that came before or after.
I was commenting on the incredible level of jargon. This post is even more impressive!
Lots of definitive-sounding opinions from people who clearly don't have design experience. It's fun to be equipped to see through comments that sound good but are total bullshit to someone who knows what they're talking…
Thats... almost exactly what they did though.
Hate to break it to you, but all these "problems" with the logo were exactly the same in the old logo. You got distracted by the ham-fisted layer styles and fooled into thinking that made it good. The fact that you said…
This article is just a guy whining about how he personally doesn't like a logo. This logo is just fine, and it's certainly better than the old one that tried to look like it was made of physical material. Obviously the…
Love to force distracted driving!
The solution is to stop re-writing basic browser functions. Just let me scroll.
"good signal is inbound" - mhm yep definitely english
It's a great idea that I'm sure some people would want. It doesn't have to be a "startup"
exactly. not everything needs vc money.
everything could be a small business, not everything is a startup.
not everything is a startup
This is some real tinfoil hat shit
This is absolutely not the reason, they got a whiff of some anti-trust stuff and are trying to head it off.
Fascinating, but this article needs a proofread, damn... "The virtual world on the LED screen is fantastic for many uses, but obviously an actor cannot walk through the screen, so an open doorway doesn't work when it's…
Lol he greatly expanded it, what are you talking about.
Bernie's "independent" label means very little. Look at how he votes. He's a Democrat. It's a weird attempted knock against him considering how consistent he's always been.
Weird definition of "choice."
The WSJ editorial board is garbage and will fall over themselves to side with corporate America even if it means making untenable arguments.
Yep! But I don't think a ban is needed to remove cars. Just make it undesirable to have one. Remove incentives to drive. For example, removing parking (free parking especially) is a great way to remove cars.
The data disagrees. Narrowing streets, adding vertical elements to the edges of streets, and removing lanes works. Congestion pricing helps too!
Skip the red light camera phase and just start redesigning the streets so they don't invite speeding and dangerous driving. No amount of enforcement is ever going to stop assholes. Making them feel like they might hurt…
Purely subjective. I personally see no difference in the balance, and either way, "balanced" doesn't mean correct.
It's the giant SUVs. The answer is obvious just by walking around, but the data is an obvious correlation as well. Any car that you can't see a child out of should be illegal.
Flat, simple logo design has nothing to do with "going digital" - all the gradients and chrome shit layered on top of the existing logo are far more "digital" than anything that came before or after.
I was commenting on the incredible level of jargon. This post is even more impressive!
Lots of definitive-sounding opinions from people who clearly don't have design experience. It's fun to be equipped to see through comments that sound good but are total bullshit to someone who knows what they're talking…
Thats... almost exactly what they did though.
Hate to break it to you, but all these "problems" with the logo were exactly the same in the old logo. You got distracted by the ham-fisted layer styles and fooled into thinking that made it good. The fact that you said…
This article is just a guy whining about how he personally doesn't like a logo. This logo is just fine, and it's certainly better than the old one that tried to look like it was made of physical material. Obviously the…
Love to force distracted driving!
The solution is to stop re-writing basic browser functions. Just let me scroll.
"good signal is inbound" - mhm yep definitely english
It's a great idea that I'm sure some people would want. It doesn't have to be a "startup"
exactly. not everything needs vc money.
everything could be a small business, not everything is a startup.
not everything is a startup
This is some real tinfoil hat shit
This is absolutely not the reason, they got a whiff of some anti-trust stuff and are trying to head it off.
Fascinating, but this article needs a proofread, damn... "The virtual world on the LED screen is fantastic for many uses, but obviously an actor cannot walk through the screen, so an open doorway doesn't work when it's…
Lol he greatly expanded it, what are you talking about.
Bernie's "independent" label means very little. Look at how he votes. He's a Democrat. It's a weird attempted knock against him considering how consistent he's always been.
Weird definition of "choice."