Heads up poker is precisely about equilibrium. Your straddle reference is also irrelevant, this is not live multiway poker. "Tricking an opponent into thinking it has metaphorically thrown rock" extrapolated into a…
If you define a 'not very good' strategy as losing at a maximum of 0, then sure. Playing optimally means the worst case scenario against any opponent would be breaking even. It doesn't have to be trained on individual…
You can't lead it to believe a point is an optimum, it's just responded to a bet size/check in isolation given the information it has. If you 'feign weakness' in a given spot it will just respond as optimally as…
The aim of the AI isn't to adopt to poor strategies, rather to play an approximate optimal strategy itself. It's aiming to be unexploitable, the further the other players deviate from optimal, the more it wins. It's EV…
Heads up poker is precisely about equilibrium. Your straddle reference is also irrelevant, this is not live multiway poker. "Tricking an opponent into thinking it has metaphorically thrown rock" extrapolated into a…
If you define a 'not very good' strategy as losing at a maximum of 0, then sure. Playing optimally means the worst case scenario against any opponent would be breaking even. It doesn't have to be trained on individual…
You can't lead it to believe a point is an optimum, it's just responded to a bet size/check in isolation given the information it has. If you 'feign weakness' in a given spot it will just respond as optimally as…
The aim of the AI isn't to adopt to poor strategies, rather to play an approximate optimal strategy itself. It's aiming to be unexploitable, the further the other players deviate from optimal, the more it wins. It's EV…