Repeating what? The same outdated, misrepresented arguments mainly relied on by react fandom? It's simple, lot's of options out there. If comfort and loyalty clearly takes precedence over best solutions, you've already…
> Given that they were introduced in 2011, and in regards to their usage you hear... well crickets > I think we can safely say that web components have failed. > It doesn’t look similar to React at all, and still…
There's so much less cruft and overhead with lit-html, and you get speed that's akin to vanilla JavaScript. As for JSX, I think we can all get used to something non-standard, which after enough time feels normal, but…
Repeating what? The same outdated, misrepresented arguments mainly relied on by react fandom? It's simple, lot's of options out there. If comfort and loyalty clearly takes precedence over best solutions, you've already…
> Given that they were introduced in 2011, and in regards to their usage you hear... well crickets > I think we can safely say that web components have failed. > It doesn’t look similar to React at all, and still…
There's so much less cruft and overhead with lit-html, and you get speed that's akin to vanilla JavaScript. As for JSX, I think we can all get used to something non-standard, which after enough time feels normal, but…