The ongoing model anchoring/grounding issue likely affects all GPT-4 checkpoints/variants, but is most prominent with the latest "gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09" variant due to its most recent cutoff date, might imply deeper…
I think there's a bigger underlying problem with the current GPT-4 model(s) atm: Go to the API Playground and ask the model what is its current cutoff date. For example, in its chat, if you're not instructing it with…
"lol" > Those days are pretty much behind us. Sure, you can compile code and tweak software configurations if you want to--but most of the time, users don't want to. Organizations generally don't want to, they want to…
> The tarballs mismatching from the git tree is a feature, not a bug. A feature which allowed the exploit to take place, let's put it that way. Over here: https://gist.github.com/thesamesam/223949d5a074ebc3dce9ee78b...…
Asking this here too: why isn't there an automated A/B or diff match for the tarball contents to match the repo, auto-flag with a warning if that happens? Am I missing something here?
- * _ring ring_ * - "Hello?" - "It's Lasse Collin." - "Why are you collin me? Why not just use the backdoor?"
Been saying this the whole day now, GitHub really needs an automated diff / A/B check-up on tarballs against the actual repo, flag everything with at least a warning (+[insert additional scrutiny steps here]) when the…
> I would go further than that: all files which are in a distributed tarball, but not on the corresponding git repository, should be treated as suspect. This and the automated A/B / diff to check the tarball against the…
I'm wondering is there i.e. no way to add an automated flagging system that A/B / `diff` checks the tarball contents against the repo's files and warns if there's a mismatch? This would be on i.e. GitHub's end so that…
In the future: automated `diff` or any other A/B check to see whether or not the tarball matches the source repo (if not, auto-flag with a mismatch warning attribute), is that feasible to implement?
I tested Gemini the other week after the 1.5 update rolled out, by running some AI ethics related papers through it and it started inserting and rambling about its own opinions on top of the actual analysis on how…
Exactly, and I agree that this is where OpenAI too is still struggling with their arbitrary content policy-related flagging based on the user's input, even when nothing "bad" is being asked nor requested -- see my post…
> Nietzsche once said "God is dead", but what did we replace it with? "Deus ex machina" (in the classical use of the word as a crude theatrical contraption) and in the most absurd manner possible:…
One thing that could be mentioned is how OpenAI's content policy flagging system is still unbearably overzealous on the ChatGPT platform (both w/ GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), punishing the user for using "bad words" in their…
It's broken on so many levels at the moment that it's unreal. Try asking Bard what model is it based on right now and you'll get all sorts of imaginable answers from PaLM2 to LaMDA to a "mixture of models" alongside the…
Sure. But, you could auto-encrypt your ~/.bash_history if you're concerned about it being a problem and might need it for backtracing any issues etc?
> At Apple, we believe that climate change is one of the world’s most urgent priorities and we are deeply committed to doing our part. ... and meanwhile, the company constantly does typical scummy corpo moves to reduce…
It might unironically make the game run better than it is running now with Unity. If you've ever ran your own Rust (the game) server, you might've noticed just how wonky the whole framework is. Just switching…
Unless I'm mistaken, it has a lot to do with the albedo that in this case when the surface material's properties turns from reflection (glacier) to absorption (rock material). Wikipedia:…
The ongoing model anchoring/grounding issue likely affects all GPT-4 checkpoints/variants, but is most prominent with the latest "gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09" variant due to its most recent cutoff date, might imply deeper…
I think there's a bigger underlying problem with the current GPT-4 model(s) atm: Go to the API Playground and ask the model what is its current cutoff date. For example, in its chat, if you're not instructing it with…
"lol" > Those days are pretty much behind us. Sure, you can compile code and tweak software configurations if you want to--but most of the time, users don't want to. Organizations generally don't want to, they want to…
> The tarballs mismatching from the git tree is a feature, not a bug. A feature which allowed the exploit to take place, let's put it that way. Over here: https://gist.github.com/thesamesam/223949d5a074ebc3dce9ee78b...…
Asking this here too: why isn't there an automated A/B or diff match for the tarball contents to match the repo, auto-flag with a warning if that happens? Am I missing something here?
- * _ring ring_ * - "Hello?" - "It's Lasse Collin." - "Why are you collin me? Why not just use the backdoor?"
Been saying this the whole day now, GitHub really needs an automated diff / A/B check-up on tarballs against the actual repo, flag everything with at least a warning (+[insert additional scrutiny steps here]) when the…
> I would go further than that: all files which are in a distributed tarball, but not on the corresponding git repository, should be treated as suspect. This and the automated A/B / diff to check the tarball against the…
I'm wondering is there i.e. no way to add an automated flagging system that A/B / `diff` checks the tarball contents against the repo's files and warns if there's a mismatch? This would be on i.e. GitHub's end so that…
In the future: automated `diff` or any other A/B check to see whether or not the tarball matches the source repo (if not, auto-flag with a mismatch warning attribute), is that feasible to implement?
I tested Gemini the other week after the 1.5 update rolled out, by running some AI ethics related papers through it and it started inserting and rambling about its own opinions on top of the actual analysis on how…
Exactly, and I agree that this is where OpenAI too is still struggling with their arbitrary content policy-related flagging based on the user's input, even when nothing "bad" is being asked nor requested -- see my post…
> Nietzsche once said "God is dead", but what did we replace it with? "Deus ex machina" (in the classical use of the word as a crude theatrical contraption) and in the most absurd manner possible:…
One thing that could be mentioned is how OpenAI's content policy flagging system is still unbearably overzealous on the ChatGPT platform (both w/ GPT-3.5 and GPT-4), punishing the user for using "bad words" in their…
It's broken on so many levels at the moment that it's unreal. Try asking Bard what model is it based on right now and you'll get all sorts of imaginable answers from PaLM2 to LaMDA to a "mixture of models" alongside the…
Sure. But, you could auto-encrypt your ~/.bash_history if you're concerned about it being a problem and might need it for backtracing any issues etc?
> At Apple, we believe that climate change is one of the world’s most urgent priorities and we are deeply committed to doing our part. ... and meanwhile, the company constantly does typical scummy corpo moves to reduce…
It might unironically make the game run better than it is running now with Unity. If you've ever ran your own Rust (the game) server, you might've noticed just how wonky the whole framework is. Just switching…
Unless I'm mistaken, it has a lot to do with the albedo that in this case when the surface material's properties turns from reflection (glacier) to absorption (rock material). Wikipedia:…