> we have no idea what it was like to move into the Wild West and the danger and hardship that entailed. We have some idea, but what's your point? Because life is difficult, let's kill a bunch of indian men,women and…
> The modern day Inuit are descendants of conquerors in exactly the same way that descendants of European settlers are. Highly doubtful. The Dorset culture probably died off due to change in climate and their failure to…
I did say otherwise? Not sure what your point is.
> But let's not romanticize Native American culture either. Absolutely. But lets also not pretend that the natives were racially motivated genocidal maniacs either. > The Comanche formed a barrier between the Spanish…
> Do you have any sources for that. Yes, it called history and biology. Disease doesn't work that way and history proves it didn't work that way. > The hypothesis that disease was primarily responsible for wiping out…
Japan, SKorea, Taiwan and the UK have the benefit of living in pax americana and being an ally of america. It has access to all the resources they need... Russia's problem is that their vast territory is also their…
> The U.S. at that time was nobody. The US was an APEX power and had been for a long time. Nobody could conquer it. To claim the US was a nobody is a laughable. > It was still undergoing the post-Civil War recovery…
> The disease hypothesis puzzles me because it cannot explain the reality of such countries The disease hypothesis is bullshit. Some retard wrote a silly book about it and nytimes pushed it like it was gospel. The royal…
But 95% of natives didn't die of disease. Unless you are saying white men are a disease. We had to cull the indians like we culled the bison, deer, wolves, bears, etc. It was the most successful genocidal campaign in…
> I mean very productive land, lots of mineral resources... It wasn't productive like the US territory was. It was mostly inhospitable tundra. The bolsheviks weren't an economic superpower for the same reason the…
> we have no idea what it was like to move into the Wild West and the danger and hardship that entailed. We have some idea, but what's your point? Because life is difficult, let's kill a bunch of indian men,women and…
> The modern day Inuit are descendants of conquerors in exactly the same way that descendants of European settlers are. Highly doubtful. The Dorset culture probably died off due to change in climate and their failure to…
I did say otherwise? Not sure what your point is.
> But let's not romanticize Native American culture either. Absolutely. But lets also not pretend that the natives were racially motivated genocidal maniacs either. > The Comanche formed a barrier between the Spanish…
> Do you have any sources for that. Yes, it called history and biology. Disease doesn't work that way and history proves it didn't work that way. > The hypothesis that disease was primarily responsible for wiping out…
Japan, SKorea, Taiwan and the UK have the benefit of living in pax americana and being an ally of america. It has access to all the resources they need... Russia's problem is that their vast territory is also their…
> The U.S. at that time was nobody. The US was an APEX power and had been for a long time. Nobody could conquer it. To claim the US was a nobody is a laughable. > It was still undergoing the post-Civil War recovery…
> The disease hypothesis puzzles me because it cannot explain the reality of such countries The disease hypothesis is bullshit. Some retard wrote a silly book about it and nytimes pushed it like it was gospel. The royal…
But 95% of natives didn't die of disease. Unless you are saying white men are a disease. We had to cull the indians like we culled the bison, deer, wolves, bears, etc. It was the most successful genocidal campaign in…
> I mean very productive land, lots of mineral resources... It wasn't productive like the US territory was. It was mostly inhospitable tundra. The bolsheviks weren't an economic superpower for the same reason the…