That's entirely possible! Apologies if that is the case.
A canine geneticist and an expert in animal behavior showed this to be the case and their research agrees with previous studies, but because you happen to think otherwise, it must not be true. Maybe I'm missing…
Or maybe it wouldn't have taken so long. ;p
I wonder if you could get actionable results if recipes were the level of granularity you ran the analysis on.
It's important not to confuse theory with scientific theory. They have very different meanings. In everyday speech a theory is roughly equivalent to a guess. In science, a theory is a well tested explanation of some…
A theory comes later. You start off with a hypothesis. You don't make any assumptions of validity.
This is my understanding. You start with a hypothesis with no assumption of truth. Using that hypothesis you make a prediction and then use observation to test your prediction. During your observation you may find proof…
That's entirely possible! Apologies if that is the case.
A canine geneticist and an expert in animal behavior showed this to be the case and their research agrees with previous studies, but because you happen to think otherwise, it must not be true. Maybe I'm missing…
Or maybe it wouldn't have taken so long. ;p
I wonder if you could get actionable results if recipes were the level of granularity you ran the analysis on.
It's important not to confuse theory with scientific theory. They have very different meanings. In everyday speech a theory is roughly equivalent to a guess. In science, a theory is a well tested explanation of some…
A theory comes later. You start off with a hypothesis. You don't make any assumptions of validity.
This is my understanding. You start with a hypothesis with no assumption of truth. Using that hypothesis you make a prediction and then use observation to test your prediction. During your observation you may find proof…