Derek Dreyer and collaborators are working on specifying what needs to be proven about unsafe code, see http://plv.mpi-sws.org/rustbelt/
To give more context, B. Pierce, one of the authors of the Dropbox paper is (one of?) the main author of Unison, and also coauthor of the paper you linked. EDIT: The parent cited…
Given his support of GamerGate (http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?cat=64) I don't really think his opinion on this matter are very fair and balanced...
Isn't Coq's language, Gallina, not Turing complete (all functions must terminate)? It's still a programming language.
It's for _any_ such system. Edit : it says that if there is such a proof, then the system in inconsistant.
It's their PR photos. There are these too (and many more on that blog) : http://universiteenruines.tumblr.com/image/103057236913 http://universiteenruines.tumblr.com/post/104835621673/nosta...
Derek Dreyer and collaborators are working on specifying what needs to be proven about unsafe code, see http://plv.mpi-sws.org/rustbelt/
To give more context, B. Pierce, one of the authors of the Dropbox paper is (one of?) the main author of Unison, and also coauthor of the paper you linked. EDIT: The parent cited…
Given his support of GamerGate (http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?cat=64) I don't really think his opinion on this matter are very fair and balanced...
Isn't Coq's language, Gallina, not Turing complete (all functions must terminate)? It's still a programming language.
It's for _any_ such system. Edit : it says that if there is such a proof, then the system in inconsistant.
It's their PR photos. There are these too (and many more on that blog) : http://universiteenruines.tumblr.com/image/103057236913 http://universiteenruines.tumblr.com/post/104835621673/nosta...