It is. I tried it out but it doesn't have the fidelity w.r.t I/O and 'hooks' I was looking for. Then again, I'm working beyond reinforcement learning. More advanced A.I necessitates more advanced gym. I highlighted…
To test out increasingly 'general' and advanced A.I, you need a sandbox/playground environment... You can use a real-world environment with a robot (noisy, more latency, computationally restrictive , more headaches, and…
It depends on what your aim is. If you want to jump into the field, follow what the field is doing and/or suggesting. If you want to go down the rabbit hole, i'd suggest Jeff Hawkin's book (On Intelligence) The…
Basically yes. But that's not only incredibly effective, it's quite possibly how real brains work too. A lot of people do believe it is a path to AGI. > It's only incredibly effective in a static world. The world is not…
Isn't deep learning the correct approach though? > No. It's a piece of a much larger puzzle and only a partial piece at that. An overfit piece that people are over-applying. This is why things are overly complex and…
Lots of theoretical models, philosophical, and metaphysical thinking... The scientific method... Actual in-depth studies centered on the system you're trying to understand and duplicate in another form. You know..…
"Very few people today would have the audacity to explicitly try building human-level AI." Hmmm, there are a considerable number of people/groups who have this audacity... Have for decades... and they have been…
So, a probability driven dynamic call-stack FSM. I have seen this concept used in many ways before without the fanfare (i.e : code coverage/test suites and game A.I Engines) It is indeed a cool approach and no doubt…
It is. I tried it out but it doesn't have the fidelity w.r.t I/O and 'hooks' I was looking for. Then again, I'm working beyond reinforcement learning. More advanced A.I necessitates more advanced gym. I highlighted…
To test out increasingly 'general' and advanced A.I, you need a sandbox/playground environment... You can use a real-world environment with a robot (noisy, more latency, computationally restrictive , more headaches, and…
It depends on what your aim is. If you want to jump into the field, follow what the field is doing and/or suggesting. If you want to go down the rabbit hole, i'd suggest Jeff Hawkin's book (On Intelligence) The…
Basically yes. But that's not only incredibly effective, it's quite possibly how real brains work too. A lot of people do believe it is a path to AGI. > It's only incredibly effective in a static world. The world is not…
Isn't deep learning the correct approach though? > No. It's a piece of a much larger puzzle and only a partial piece at that. An overfit piece that people are over-applying. This is why things are overly complex and…
Lots of theoretical models, philosophical, and metaphysical thinking... The scientific method... Actual in-depth studies centered on the system you're trying to understand and duplicate in another form. You know..…
"Very few people today would have the audacity to explicitly try building human-level AI." Hmmm, there are a considerable number of people/groups who have this audacity... Have for decades... and they have been…
So, a probability driven dynamic call-stack FSM. I have seen this concept used in many ways before without the fanfare (i.e : code coverage/test suites and game A.I Engines) It is indeed a cool approach and no doubt…