Here's what the Cambridge Library says [1] about scans: > Scans are provided with certain conditions of supply: > 1. Not pass on, or upload, the electronic copy or make it available to any other person > 2. Not make…
I've added a clarification to the end of the post on whether angzarr might be found in the Cambridge Library document, which I mentioned in my twitter thread but not in the post: > Furthermore, the Rare Books department…
When I tried to request it via ILL, they told me that the amount of material scanned "exceeds copyright law and scanning limits". I haven't bothered to look up whatever law that is, and I'm not sure if it's a US thing,…
lmao silly mistake. I'll get that fixed, thanks
Whoops, thanks for catching that typo!
Minor point, but: > A test case for the bottom-up methodology is the bottom meson, a composite particle made of something called a bottom quark and another known as a lighter quark. I thought mesons were just a quark +…
Here's what the Cambridge Library says [1] about scans: > Scans are provided with certain conditions of supply: > 1. Not pass on, or upload, the electronic copy or make it available to any other person > 2. Not make…
I've added a clarification to the end of the post on whether angzarr might be found in the Cambridge Library document, which I mentioned in my twitter thread but not in the post: > Furthermore, the Rare Books department…
When I tried to request it via ILL, they told me that the amount of material scanned "exceeds copyright law and scanning limits". I haven't bothered to look up whatever law that is, and I'm not sure if it's a US thing,…
lmao silly mistake. I'll get that fixed, thanks
Whoops, thanks for catching that typo!
Minor point, but: > A test case for the bottom-up methodology is the bottom meson, a composite particle made of something called a bottom quark and another known as a lighter quark. I thought mesons were just a quark +…