I agree with jdm2212. This was not a well thought out article. The ultimate purpose of marriage is to provide a stable environment for raising children. The fact that she mentions being married reduces her after-work…
Exactly. It is like being at a club until closing and then the lights come on. It no longer feels cool to be there. Feels like I'm just standing around in a school gym filled with too many people.
Agree. I'm actually surprised that only 40% are considered ALICE. Is everyone else asset-unlimited, income-infinite?
Spot on.
Totally agree. The question should be about restriction not equality. If I am restricted from being a female coder, that is a problem. Otherwise, nothing wrong with the sexes sorting themselves out according to their…
So true. It is also embarrassing for many women in tech. I don't want anyone to look at me and feel threatened but I know sometimes people do feel that way.
Good point. There are a lot of dangerous ideas. The best way to counter them is by exposing them to debate and dialogue. Banning them only lets the ideas grow unchallenged.
I agree with jdm2212. This was not a well thought out article. The ultimate purpose of marriage is to provide a stable environment for raising children. The fact that she mentions being married reduces her after-work…
Exactly. It is like being at a club until closing and then the lights come on. It no longer feels cool to be there. Feels like I'm just standing around in a school gym filled with too many people.
Agree. I'm actually surprised that only 40% are considered ALICE. Is everyone else asset-unlimited, income-infinite?
Spot on.
Totally agree. The question should be about restriction not equality. If I am restricted from being a female coder, that is a problem. Otherwise, nothing wrong with the sexes sorting themselves out according to their…
So true. It is also embarrassing for many women in tech. I don't want anyone to look at me and feel threatened but I know sometimes people do feel that way.
Good point. There are a lot of dangerous ideas. The best way to counter them is by exposing them to debate and dialogue. Banning them only lets the ideas grow unchallenged.