luna is the first model that has outdone gpt-5-mini on the pareto frontier for some of my high value, cost sensitive ai product workflows. it's both cheaper (by about 60% in real world use) and higher quality based on…
We’re using GPT-5-mini in an enterprise data-processing workflow, and we too see that GPT-5.4 nano performs materially worse for our requirements, roughly 30% worse as measured through our test suite.
totally agree. and hearing this one-sided diatribe spoken with so much conviction makes my eyes roll to the back of my head, he just "knew" everything was all ai generated.
i suggest having codex review claude's plans. i consistently find it catches 2nd order effects of planned changes much better which can lead to a total change of direction in some cases.
https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter ? looking into it. Definitely going through and pinning all my 3rd party actions to specific commits e.g. party/package@<commitsha>.
luna is the first model that has outdone gpt-5-mini on the pareto frontier for some of my high value, cost sensitive ai product workflows. it's both cheaper (by about 60% in real world use) and higher quality based on…
We’re using GPT-5-mini in an enterprise data-processing workflow, and we too see that GPT-5.4 nano performs materially worse for our requirements, roughly 30% worse as measured through our test suite.
totally agree. and hearing this one-sided diatribe spoken with so much conviction makes my eyes roll to the back of my head, he just "knew" everything was all ai generated.
i suggest having codex review claude's plans. i consistently find it catches 2nd order effects of planned changes much better which can lead to a total change of direction in some cases.
https://github.com/dorny/paths-filter ? looking into it. Definitely going through and pinning all my 3rd party actions to specific commits e.g. party/package@<commitsha>.