I assume you agree with my argument. It's reasonable to assume that block delay in PoW network has log-normal distribution too. Let's see what will happen if we add delay due to the block mining. If there is a Poisson…
> There's some confusion in this question. A log normal distribution is proof enough that multiplication exists. Ha-ha. Maybe it's a good reason to forge the evidence. However, it doesn't mean you can't forge an…
Don't you think this claim should be supported by some reputable secondary source?
You appeal to your intuition. However, it could be misleading. Log-normal distribution has been found in many real world processes. Could you explain where is multiplication in cases below? 1) The length of comments…
> Not sure what these two versions of the blockchain you're talking about are. Really?! One version is "Vitalik's fork" and another one is "non-Vitalik's fork". Which one of them is a valid chain? Any idea? Assume the…
> Vitalik Buterin came up with a solution for the nothing-at-stake problem Is that a link to an article from a peer reviewed academic journal? > There are several PoS networks out there such as Cosmos, Tezos, etc,…
But it doesn't mean there should be a normal distribution there! Have you ever heard about log normal distribution?
Is that a link to fairy tales from Vitalik? The fact that "stateless client" is written in Ethereum 2.0 roadmap is an evidence that this project has no future.
What has happened in 2014? Is that a time when brain-washing campaign in crypto-media has been started? "Slashing" is not a solution to this problem.
> They get slashed when anyone submits evidence of them doing this. Who will record this "evidence" to the blockchain? Anyway there will be two versions of the blockchain. In one of them attacker's stake was not slashed…
> ... both of your big-O comments have counter examples (check out Coda for 1) Have you ever checked on your own any such "counter example"?
Block propagation time is only a part of the problem and it doesn't make sense to consider it separately from other parameters. By the way, why do you think block times in PoS have a normal distribution?
But at what cost? There is no chance it could preserve the same level of decentralization.
There is no validation of blocks in a "stateless manner". Network is secured by those validators who know what they validate.
I assume you agree with my argument. It's reasonable to assume that block delay in PoW network has log-normal distribution too. Let's see what will happen if we add delay due to the block mining. If there is a Poisson…
> There's some confusion in this question. A log normal distribution is proof enough that multiplication exists. Ha-ha. Maybe it's a good reason to forge the evidence. However, it doesn't mean you can't forge an…
Don't you think this claim should be supported by some reputable secondary source?
You appeal to your intuition. However, it could be misleading. Log-normal distribution has been found in many real world processes. Could you explain where is multiplication in cases below? 1) The length of comments…
> Not sure what these two versions of the blockchain you're talking about are. Really?! One version is "Vitalik's fork" and another one is "non-Vitalik's fork". Which one of them is a valid chain? Any idea? Assume the…
> Vitalik Buterin came up with a solution for the nothing-at-stake problem Is that a link to an article from a peer reviewed academic journal? > There are several PoS networks out there such as Cosmos, Tezos, etc,…
But it doesn't mean there should be a normal distribution there! Have you ever heard about log normal distribution?
Is that a link to fairy tales from Vitalik? The fact that "stateless client" is written in Ethereum 2.0 roadmap is an evidence that this project has no future.
What has happened in 2014? Is that a time when brain-washing campaign in crypto-media has been started? "Slashing" is not a solution to this problem.
> They get slashed when anyone submits evidence of them doing this. Who will record this "evidence" to the blockchain? Anyway there will be two versions of the blockchain. In one of them attacker's stake was not slashed…
> ... both of your big-O comments have counter examples (check out Coda for 1) Have you ever checked on your own any such "counter example"?
Block propagation time is only a part of the problem and it doesn't make sense to consider it separately from other parameters. By the way, why do you think block times in PoS have a normal distribution?
But at what cost? There is no chance it could preserve the same level of decentralization.
There is no validation of blocks in a "stateless manner". Network is secured by those validators who know what they validate.