We did that because after using git on top of Google Code's SVN backend (using git-svn) for a year or so, we were really limited by Subversion's lack of real brancing/merging. While on top of SVN, we only had two…
Hi all, If you have any questions about Ganeti installation/configuration or related stuff, remember that we have a (friendly) mailing list — ganeti@googlegroups.com regards, iustin
I thought that is clear in the paper—I didn't have (almost) any experience with Haskell before, indeed. And the stack trace example is not related to ghci. You run software in production, and it crashes. What do you get?
It is true, but it's also unfortunate—I think a lot of Haskell's strengths come from its type system. So what makes Haskell worth learning also makes it hard to learn Haskell :)
As I tried to explain in the paper, this started as an experiment, and not "let's write this in Haskell and use it in production". But aside from that, the cluster balancer runs in just 5MB of RAM (RSS). I'm not…
We did that because after using git on top of Google Code's SVN backend (using git-svn) for a year or so, we were really limited by Subversion's lack of real brancing/merging. While on top of SVN, we only had two…
Hi all, If you have any questions about Ganeti installation/configuration or related stuff, remember that we have a (friendly) mailing list — ganeti@googlegroups.com regards, iustin
I thought that is clear in the paper—I didn't have (almost) any experience with Haskell before, indeed. And the stack trace example is not related to ghci. You run software in production, and it crashes. What do you get?
It is true, but it's also unfortunate—I think a lot of Haskell's strengths come from its type system. So what makes Haskell worth learning also makes it hard to learn Haskell :)
As I tried to explain in the paper, this started as an experiment, and not "let's write this in Haskell and use it in production". But aside from that, the cluster balancer runs in just 5MB of RAM (RSS). I'm not…