There are downsides, it’s just that it’s the best move from a business perspective. That doesn’t make it the best move from any other angle.
Futures contracts were a mistake, god damn
Up until very recently I would have said definitely not, but we're talking about LLM scrapers, who knows how much they've got crammed into their context windows.
It’s not great, but you could add it to the body of a 429 response.
You mean plagiarized it?
Is this not belligerently ignoring the fact that this work is already done imperfectly? I can’t tell you how many serious errors I’ve caught in just a short time of automating the generation of complex spreadsheets from…
She’s not doing either. In that same conversation, she goes on to talk about how we don’t live in that world and can’t return there, and what the implications should be for policy.
If I’m not mistaken, she goes on to say “but we don’t live in that world, and so we must…” and goes on to argue for policy that doesn’t neglect the poorest and least fortunate members of society.
The author has previously published an article with a detailed analysis of the math of GU, and why it doesn't work: https://files.timothynguyen.org/geometric_unity.pdf The reception of that article by the group in…
I wonder if bundling it with ai is to deal with that pesky internal issue where engineers are always trying to turn off ads for their yt accounts
Sorry, but citation needed. Means testing might seem “obvious” from first principles, but from a policy point of view, it makes little to no sense. The macroeconomic effects of welfare programs create a society that is…
I mean, that's a very corporate accounting way of looking at it. But countries are not corporations, or even banks, and the abstraction is so leaky it's pretty much never worth using.
Llama was kind of a forced hand though. Yknow, when the model was leaked?
Wordcels discover category theory lol
There are plenty of places where consumption taxes DON’T have a strong effect, like vice taxes on tobacco and alcohol. It’s absolutely worth actually testing it.
I have interrogated it in those cases. I was not misunderstanding.
We’re was autocorrected from where
In my own experience, the vast majority of people using this phrase ARE using it as a source of authority. People will ask me about things I am an actual expert in, and then when they don’t like my response, hit me with…
I do not need people to lead on that. That’s precisely why leading on “I asked ChatGPT and it said…” makes me trust something less — the speaker is actively assigning responsibility for what’s to come to some other…
That’s exactly how I feel
I see nobody here blaming tools and not people!
Something that really frustrates me about interacting with (some) people who use AI a lot is that they will often tell me things that start “I asked ChatGPT and it said…” stop it!!! If the chatbot taught you something…
Sure, but how would they go about capturing that money?
Gene drives scare me. Being able to forcibly propagate a gene through a population seems like a strong candidate for causing an ecological disaster.
Second addendum, chapter 4 is about second order logic and apparently I just forgot that exercise 1 is simply showing that you get all of the structure built up in Chapter 3 with Peano's original formulation in…
There are downsides, it’s just that it’s the best move from a business perspective. That doesn’t make it the best move from any other angle.
Futures contracts were a mistake, god damn
Up until very recently I would have said definitely not, but we're talking about LLM scrapers, who knows how much they've got crammed into their context windows.
It’s not great, but you could add it to the body of a 429 response.
You mean plagiarized it?
Is this not belligerently ignoring the fact that this work is already done imperfectly? I can’t tell you how many serious errors I’ve caught in just a short time of automating the generation of complex spreadsheets from…
She’s not doing either. In that same conversation, she goes on to talk about how we don’t live in that world and can’t return there, and what the implications should be for policy.
If I’m not mistaken, she goes on to say “but we don’t live in that world, and so we must…” and goes on to argue for policy that doesn’t neglect the poorest and least fortunate members of society.
The author has previously published an article with a detailed analysis of the math of GU, and why it doesn't work: https://files.timothynguyen.org/geometric_unity.pdf The reception of that article by the group in…
I wonder if bundling it with ai is to deal with that pesky internal issue where engineers are always trying to turn off ads for their yt accounts
Sorry, but citation needed. Means testing might seem “obvious” from first principles, but from a policy point of view, it makes little to no sense. The macroeconomic effects of welfare programs create a society that is…
I mean, that's a very corporate accounting way of looking at it. But countries are not corporations, or even banks, and the abstraction is so leaky it's pretty much never worth using.
Llama was kind of a forced hand though. Yknow, when the model was leaked?
Wordcels discover category theory lol
There are plenty of places where consumption taxes DON’T have a strong effect, like vice taxes on tobacco and alcohol. It’s absolutely worth actually testing it.
I have interrogated it in those cases. I was not misunderstanding.
We’re was autocorrected from where
In my own experience, the vast majority of people using this phrase ARE using it as a source of authority. People will ask me about things I am an actual expert in, and then when they don’t like my response, hit me with…
I do not need people to lead on that. That’s precisely why leading on “I asked ChatGPT and it said…” makes me trust something less — the speaker is actively assigning responsibility for what’s to come to some other…
That’s exactly how I feel
I see nobody here blaming tools and not people!
Something that really frustrates me about interacting with (some) people who use AI a lot is that they will often tell me things that start “I asked ChatGPT and it said…” stop it!!! If the chatbot taught you something…
Sure, but how would they go about capturing that money?
Gene drives scare me. Being able to forcibly propagate a gene through a population seems like a strong candidate for causing an ecological disaster.
Second addendum, chapter 4 is about second order logic and apparently I just forgot that exercise 1 is simply showing that you get all of the structure built up in Chapter 3 with Peano's original formulation in…