In fact, the idea of handshake seems to take care of exactly that. Decentralization without loss of security. Basically, you have the name and the certificate associated in the chain itself and go the dane route. I'm…
I have always wondered. What prevents them from sending ad links in the feed? If the clients could render them, that there's a workable model, right?
I agree with @jrockway below. There is no point in retaining TLDs the way are now. The original idea of TLDs were to have separate namespaces. For example, apple.com is the company apple and apple.fruit, may be a fruit…
/like a pretty arbitrary line/ Really? Do you think they would/could lie on the features of a product that they deliver to a client. If they did, do you think they should get away with that? 'We have that capability'…
In fact, the idea of handshake seems to take care of exactly that. Decentralization without loss of security. Basically, you have the name and the certificate associated in the chain itself and go the dane route. I'm…
I have always wondered. What prevents them from sending ad links in the feed? If the clients could render them, that there's a workable model, right?
I agree with @jrockway below. There is no point in retaining TLDs the way are now. The original idea of TLDs were to have separate namespaces. For example, apple.com is the company apple and apple.fruit, may be a fruit…
/like a pretty arbitrary line/ Really? Do you think they would/could lie on the features of a product that they deliver to a client. If they did, do you think they should get away with that? 'We have that capability'…