Libertarians don't like having laws
Libertarians will say this is ok
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Every time I've used Android every UI was bloated, slow and buggy. It's surprising the author has found something in particular to complain about.
> The only thing I got from this post is that I want to seriously avoid working with a person who expresses themselves in such an unproductive way. Everything in this world is about being productive
I don't want websites to work offline. Also, it bothers me that websites can install themselves like that without my permission or knowledge.
Exactly my same feeling. And what's worse, is that I don't really know what those entries (.js files) can do. Can they exec code whenever they want? Or every hour? Or every minute? Can they see what I do? Can they call…
I already have free press, cronyism and corruption. They are perfectly compatible.
One thing I used to love about websites is that I knew once I closed the tab the site was gone forever and it was not allowed to execute any more code. That was heaven. But now with web workers and service workers and…
All journalists are twisted liars. I want them all to go under.
Marginal cost of software is and will always be zero.
It's a weird address that was going to cause problems like this
It's not inane and inaccurate, I also think running a DNS on 1.1.1.1 is fucking stupid
Or maybe they think this is acceptable, in the interest of security. I personally find this kind of stuff acceptable.
>To quote this excellent article[1]: "the default setting of the Canadian male: a dull but stern dad, who, under a facade of apparent normalcy and common sense, conceals a reserve of barely contained hostility toward…
Kudos to this guy. As the maintainer of an open source project, the hardest job is to tell people "your idea is stupid and I won't do it"
From my experience: they fork every lib and they don't contribute back. Just look at the list of libs that are built into Chrome.
They invented using those things right, so I don't get spam.
Gmail won because it fixed the biggest pain points with HTML email and spam. And so many years later nobody has come even close. That's not their fault.
>The “extinguish” with GMail is also well underway - it’s infamous for having an extremely strict spam filter for incoming emails from people who run personal or niche mail servers And thank God for that. That's why…
I was under the impression that he was in the committee. Why should his wife leave? I don't understand.
Of the committee. Maybe they just want to ruin his life. Credible? If it's credible, why hasn't he been convicted.
If it hasn't been proven then there's nothing to talk about. They could've made it up just so he they can kick him out.
Good, one less website owned by irresponsible people in existence. :-)
It's funny, I wonder if hearing about that github bug made them check if they had committed the same mistake... only to find that they did :-)
Libertarians don't like having laws
Libertarians will say this is ok
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Every time I've used Android every UI was bloated, slow and buggy. It's surprising the author has found something in particular to complain about.
> The only thing I got from this post is that I want to seriously avoid working with a person who expresses themselves in such an unproductive way. Everything in this world is about being productive
I don't want websites to work offline. Also, it bothers me that websites can install themselves like that without my permission or knowledge.
Exactly my same feeling. And what's worse, is that I don't really know what those entries (.js files) can do. Can they exec code whenever they want? Or every hour? Or every minute? Can they see what I do? Can they call…
I already have free press, cronyism and corruption. They are perfectly compatible.
One thing I used to love about websites is that I knew once I closed the tab the site was gone forever and it was not allowed to execute any more code. That was heaven. But now with web workers and service workers and…
All journalists are twisted liars. I want them all to go under.
Marginal cost of software is and will always be zero.
It's a weird address that was going to cause problems like this
It's not inane and inaccurate, I also think running a DNS on 1.1.1.1 is fucking stupid
Or maybe they think this is acceptable, in the interest of security. I personally find this kind of stuff acceptable.
>To quote this excellent article[1]: "the default setting of the Canadian male: a dull but stern dad, who, under a facade of apparent normalcy and common sense, conceals a reserve of barely contained hostility toward…
Kudos to this guy. As the maintainer of an open source project, the hardest job is to tell people "your idea is stupid and I won't do it"
From my experience: they fork every lib and they don't contribute back. Just look at the list of libs that are built into Chrome.
They invented using those things right, so I don't get spam.
Gmail won because it fixed the biggest pain points with HTML email and spam. And so many years later nobody has come even close. That's not their fault.
>The “extinguish” with GMail is also well underway - it’s infamous for having an extremely strict spam filter for incoming emails from people who run personal or niche mail servers And thank God for that. That's why…
I was under the impression that he was in the committee. Why should his wife leave? I don't understand.
Of the committee. Maybe they just want to ruin his life. Credible? If it's credible, why hasn't he been convicted.
If it hasn't been proven then there's nothing to talk about. They could've made it up just so he they can kick him out.
Good, one less website owned by irresponsible people in existence. :-)
It's funny, I wonder if hearing about that github bug made them check if they had committed the same mistake... only to find that they did :-)