Based on what I understand about your use case, I'd suggest considering the following if looking to improve the security/privacy posture. - A Hash style ratchet still works in your decentralized construction; Users…
Appreciate the clarity. It helps me focus without going off on a wild tangent. The durability/independence of the protocol being a primary driver makes sense, and aligns with the design. > "no privileged party at all" >…
I'm curious what the motivation is for the protocol being decentralized? Being serverless is cool and all, but what makes it worth all the extra complexity and effort? To me the future of decentralized group chats is…
Based on what I understand about your use case, I'd suggest considering the following if looking to improve the security/privacy posture. - A Hash style ratchet still works in your decentralized construction; Users…
Appreciate the clarity. It helps me focus without going off on a wild tangent. The durability/independence of the protocol being a primary driver makes sense, and aligns with the design. > "no privileged party at all" >…
I'm curious what the motivation is for the protocol being decentralized? Being serverless is cool and all, but what makes it worth all the extra complexity and effort? To me the future of decentralized group chats is…