(You know, something's always (bugged me) with Common Lisp (and other Lisps (for that matter)) but I can't seem (to remember what it was)) Allright, Lispers -- take the joke...
Very true. I've seen that hack before, but I guess I mentally settled on my first example (probably due to the irksome possibility of x=0\False). Unfortunately, there were probably more hacks than our two examples.…
The previous ternary hack in Python (which was still relatively elegant) was: a = ("False", "True")[condition] It's a little fugly -- but if you know the basic semantics of Python, it's quite readable. It is nice that…
I would argue that this is still an implementation issue w/Vista's networking stack. The RFC assumes that the DNS resolver (the client) has a public IP. This is usually not the case with most clients, and Microsoft…
(You know, something's always (bugged me) with Common Lisp (and other Lisps (for that matter)) but I can't seem (to remember what it was)) Allright, Lispers -- take the joke...
Very true. I've seen that hack before, but I guess I mentally settled on my first example (probably due to the irksome possibility of x=0\False). Unfortunately, there were probably more hacks than our two examples.…
The previous ternary hack in Python (which was still relatively elegant) was: a = ("False", "True")[condition] It's a little fugly -- but if you know the basic semantics of Python, it's quite readable. It is nice that…
I would argue that this is still an implementation issue w/Vista's networking stack. The RFC assumes that the DNS resolver (the client) has a public IP. This is usually not the case with most clients, and Microsoft…