Meta: How did this obvious pile of pseudoscience even make its way to HN top 10?
"pilot study in 14 subjects" Stop reading.
This piece is a collection of disjointed claims and complaints. There is little in the way of argumentation to support any of them (and nothing in the way of evidence). The existence of a valid opposing view on each of…
Reminds me of the time where IT at a previous employer told us that due to a "new IT strategy", our production cluster that had been sitting comfortably in the basement for years had to be moved to an "approved IT hub…
Meta: How did this obvious pile of pseudoscience even make its way to HN top 10?
"pilot study in 14 subjects" Stop reading.
This piece is a collection of disjointed claims and complaints. There is little in the way of argumentation to support any of them (and nothing in the way of evidence). The existence of a valid opposing view on each of…
Reminds me of the time where IT at a previous employer told us that due to a "new IT strategy", our production cluster that had been sitting comfortably in the basement for years had to be moved to an "approved IT hub…