Wearing a uniform is part of the job, but your employer is not required to pay for it. Pizza chains aren't required to reimburse their delivery drivers for mileage. Explain.
You seem quite ignorant about labor laws. If you don't want to use the other analogy, here's another one. Employers are not required to pay for employee uniforms even if they're mandated for the workplace.
And how is that a bad analogy? I'm responding directly to his point. Employers aren't required to pay for a host of things that are work related.
Californian tech companies aren't there for its "worker protection" laws. They're there because of the talent, which Silicon Valley has a monopoly on because of network effects.
You do realize employers aren't required to pay gas expenses for employees to drive to work, right?
Wearing a uniform is part of the job, but your employer is not required to pay for it. Pizza chains aren't required to reimburse their delivery drivers for mileage. Explain.
You seem quite ignorant about labor laws. If you don't want to use the other analogy, here's another one. Employers are not required to pay for employee uniforms even if they're mandated for the workplace.
And how is that a bad analogy? I'm responding directly to his point. Employers aren't required to pay for a host of things that are work related.
Californian tech companies aren't there for its "worker protection" laws. They're there because of the talent, which Silicon Valley has a monopoly on because of network effects.
You do realize employers aren't required to pay gas expenses for employees to drive to work, right?