[flagged]
>You can have the book at school, but the school library won't have it. False.
The books on this list are not considered banned because of decisions made by a librarian figuring out how to fill their limited space. Even if the librarian (or in some cases, even if the school district) wants to…
>The school won't kick you out for having the book, but they won't buy it. You keep saying this all over this thread, can you please tell me how you are reaching this conclusion? I have linked you to at least one entire…
>You can have it with you, but it won't be available in the school library. No, they are "prohibited in the school setting". You cannot bring it with you.
>Yeah this is a strange way to define "banned books". Pen clearly defines what they consider a ban. Hustler would not meet the definition (hint: it's not because its a magazine).
We're talking about an article titled "The Most Banned Books _in U.S. Schools_", I thought the "in U.S. schools" part provided the context, but I suppose not.
>There's state-level law saying it's illegal to own or read some books on this list? Sorry, I'll edit my comment to be more clear. It is illegal for school libraries to stock it, even if they (teachers, the district,…
>Which books and which law? The one I was referring to: https://www.sltrib.com/news/education/2024/08/02/utah-book-b... "The law, which went into effect July 1, requires that a book be removed from all public schools in…
>I find the dishonesty really off-putting. None of these books are "banned". School libraries don't stock them, they might be removed from curricula, but they are not "banned" You can look into it, if you're curious!…
>A ‘banned book’ is one that you are not allowed to own by the State. >Your school not stocking books you want is not a ban. It’s the prerogative of the institution to choose how it shapes minds. At least some of these…
>There is a part of me seriously considering making a bookshelf dedicated to all of these banned books. My local bookstore proudly features a table of "banned books" right at the entrance. It's a pretty good…
The fun thing about the computer fraud and abuse act is that just about anything can be made into a federal crime with it!
You say your mornings are sacred now; before you made the change did you treat your nights as sacred? Do you think you were always a "morning person", but didn't/couldn't realize it? Not specific to your comment here,…
I'm just pointing out that it's weird to say you changed it for length reasons if you make the new title the same length.
Super weird to call me out and make a strawman of my comment in a place I'm less likely to see it. >wanted to have a more positive framing showing the original post really did make decent points I didn't even criticize…
The thing is, you can do the same statistics without including the user's email address or otherwise directly linking a data point to a specific person. They may need to retain certain information for laws, but they…
>Both for length reasons The original title is 75 characters. Your title is 74 characters. If it was edited for length reasons, I'm not sure saving 1 character is worth it.
tomhow is the other one, and evidently the one who changed the title. apparently for "clickbait" and "length".
>ShinyHunters I had an inkling! They've been on a roll this past year or so. >This data includes a PornHub Premium member's email address, activity type, location, video URL, video name, keywords associated with the…
>No, it's a calculated marketing, not them being honest. It's obviously marketing. But their marketing strategy appears to be being unashamed about ripping off content and creating bot farms. What are you suggesting…
Same, but it wasn't made in reply to my comment for some reason, so I want to be sure!
>Attempts to characterize the above as hyperbolic probably stem from a mismatch in culture. Before I respond, can I confirm whether this supposed to be addressed at my comment?
>"never pay a human again." >"Take proven content and spawn variation." It's almost refreshing how unashamed they are. I hate it, obviously, but I kind of like it better than companies that say something dressed up in…
Genuinely, it's nice that Mozilla's user base is so passionate! There's three multi-hundred-comment submissions in the top 50 posts of HN in just the last 24 hours. I just wish some of the conversation wasn't so…
[flagged]
>You can have the book at school, but the school library won't have it. False.
The books on this list are not considered banned because of decisions made by a librarian figuring out how to fill their limited space. Even if the librarian (or in some cases, even if the school district) wants to…
>The school won't kick you out for having the book, but they won't buy it. You keep saying this all over this thread, can you please tell me how you are reaching this conclusion? I have linked you to at least one entire…
>You can have it with you, but it won't be available in the school library. No, they are "prohibited in the school setting". You cannot bring it with you.
>Yeah this is a strange way to define "banned books". Pen clearly defines what they consider a ban. Hustler would not meet the definition (hint: it's not because its a magazine).
We're talking about an article titled "The Most Banned Books _in U.S. Schools_", I thought the "in U.S. schools" part provided the context, but I suppose not.
>There's state-level law saying it's illegal to own or read some books on this list? Sorry, I'll edit my comment to be more clear. It is illegal for school libraries to stock it, even if they (teachers, the district,…
>Which books and which law? The one I was referring to: https://www.sltrib.com/news/education/2024/08/02/utah-book-b... "The law, which went into effect July 1, requires that a book be removed from all public schools in…
>I find the dishonesty really off-putting. None of these books are "banned". School libraries don't stock them, they might be removed from curricula, but they are not "banned" You can look into it, if you're curious!…
>A ‘banned book’ is one that you are not allowed to own by the State. >Your school not stocking books you want is not a ban. It’s the prerogative of the institution to choose how it shapes minds. At least some of these…
>There is a part of me seriously considering making a bookshelf dedicated to all of these banned books. My local bookstore proudly features a table of "banned books" right at the entrance. It's a pretty good…
The fun thing about the computer fraud and abuse act is that just about anything can be made into a federal crime with it!
You say your mornings are sacred now; before you made the change did you treat your nights as sacred? Do you think you were always a "morning person", but didn't/couldn't realize it? Not specific to your comment here,…
I'm just pointing out that it's weird to say you changed it for length reasons if you make the new title the same length.
Super weird to call me out and make a strawman of my comment in a place I'm less likely to see it. >wanted to have a more positive framing showing the original post really did make decent points I didn't even criticize…
The thing is, you can do the same statistics without including the user's email address or otherwise directly linking a data point to a specific person. They may need to retain certain information for laws, but they…
>Both for length reasons The original title is 75 characters. Your title is 74 characters. If it was edited for length reasons, I'm not sure saving 1 character is worth it.
tomhow is the other one, and evidently the one who changed the title. apparently for "clickbait" and "length".
>ShinyHunters I had an inkling! They've been on a roll this past year or so. >This data includes a PornHub Premium member's email address, activity type, location, video URL, video name, keywords associated with the…
>No, it's a calculated marketing, not them being honest. It's obviously marketing. But their marketing strategy appears to be being unashamed about ripping off content and creating bot farms. What are you suggesting…
Same, but it wasn't made in reply to my comment for some reason, so I want to be sure!
>Attempts to characterize the above as hyperbolic probably stem from a mismatch in culture. Before I respond, can I confirm whether this supposed to be addressed at my comment?
>"never pay a human again." >"Take proven content and spawn variation." It's almost refreshing how unashamed they are. I hate it, obviously, but I kind of like it better than companies that say something dressed up in…
Genuinely, it's nice that Mozilla's user base is so passionate! There's three multi-hundred-comment submissions in the top 50 posts of HN in just the last 24 hours. I just wish some of the conversation wasn't so…