Not to take anything away from his acting, but Patrick Stewart was not the author of his dialogue in TNG.
P.S. Slippery slope is a fallacy.
But elsif
w TAB in a properly configured emacs
`destroy_world() if $angry;` is Perl syntax. (But it's not remotely like come-from.)
`unless` came from Perl, Ruby adopted it, and so of course did Crystal.
I think the headline is nonsense. I was going to mention the MAD language by Bernard Galler et. al. that used whenever/otherwise, which I encountered in a book in the local library back in the days when everyone was…
Sigh. The SET of commenters is not the SET of users. > Are you trying to claim that the NYT site is getting brigaded by anti-AI advocates? No, I made very clear what I was claiming: Commenters are statistically biased…
It told you exactly what to do.
> By the early 1960s, programmers with interactive computers could use a “line editor” to type their code on teletypes That's quite a condition ... very few of us had access to interactive computers -- punch cards still…
> what kind of spider Spider Man's web comes from Look it up ... there isn't one.
Too much teleology.
No, they didn't make anything sound remotely like that.
Comments aren't users. Commenters are statistically biased toward complaints.
That's quite a strawman.
Disabling the feature means disabling it for everyone. If you don't want to use it, just don't use it.
> I would be different is this was yet another free, race-to-the-bottom, corner-cutting web site. > But this is New York Times Cooking. It's a subscription product that people pay hundreds of dollars for. Which is why…
The reason people are pushing back is that they aren't very bright.
> I don't want an AI to give it's best guess at what a recipe should be Then don't use this feature.
Category mistake -- it's not a fact claim so there's no burden of proof.
mancerayder did attack the argument, not any individual.
That is not how/why this came about.
I think that statement is too strong -- if ETH was a core belief then its implication P≠NP must also have been a core belief ... but I don't think that those who assumed ETH held it that strongly. As you say, it was…
But even if every problem in NP is sub-exponential (which, as tfpgh notes, this result doesn't prove), how does that make it "more likely" that every such problem is solvable in a polynomial # of steps? I feel like it's…
[flagged]
Not to take anything away from his acting, but Patrick Stewart was not the author of his dialogue in TNG.
P.S. Slippery slope is a fallacy.
But elsif
w TAB in a properly configured emacs
`destroy_world() if $angry;` is Perl syntax. (But it's not remotely like come-from.)
`unless` came from Perl, Ruby adopted it, and so of course did Crystal.
I think the headline is nonsense. I was going to mention the MAD language by Bernard Galler et. al. that used whenever/otherwise, which I encountered in a book in the local library back in the days when everyone was…
Sigh. The SET of commenters is not the SET of users. > Are you trying to claim that the NYT site is getting brigaded by anti-AI advocates? No, I made very clear what I was claiming: Commenters are statistically biased…
It told you exactly what to do.
> By the early 1960s, programmers with interactive computers could use a “line editor” to type their code on teletypes That's quite a condition ... very few of us had access to interactive computers -- punch cards still…
> what kind of spider Spider Man's web comes from Look it up ... there isn't one.
Too much teleology.
No, they didn't make anything sound remotely like that.
Comments aren't users. Commenters are statistically biased toward complaints.
That's quite a strawman.
Disabling the feature means disabling it for everyone. If you don't want to use it, just don't use it.
> I would be different is this was yet another free, race-to-the-bottom, corner-cutting web site. > But this is New York Times Cooking. It's a subscription product that people pay hundreds of dollars for. Which is why…
The reason people are pushing back is that they aren't very bright.
> I don't want an AI to give it's best guess at what a recipe should be Then don't use this feature.
Category mistake -- it's not a fact claim so there's no burden of proof.
mancerayder did attack the argument, not any individual.
That is not how/why this came about.
I think that statement is too strong -- if ETH was a core belief then its implication P≠NP must also have been a core belief ... but I don't think that those who assumed ETH held it that strongly. As you say, it was…
But even if every problem in NP is sub-exponential (which, as tfpgh notes, this result doesn't prove), how does that make it "more likely" that every such problem is solvable in a polynomial # of steps? I feel like it's…
[flagged]