jiminy_john
No user record in our sample, but jiminy_john has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but jiminy_john has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
You mean to say that in fact women are victims of feminism?
spoken like a real champ! You show'em! to those fat cats!!!
Those arguing that the client does not need to share their share of the blame, are implying basically that the client is not capable of assuming the contracts that they signed. It is quite a patronizing position but…
Hey @dang, I wanted to actually have a chance to read his comment and judge for myself if things are really as you state they are. But wouldn't you know it: it was deleted. HN mods basically are allowed to erase history…
Then you are arguing that the law that is currently in effect, and which was voted and upheld with Democrat's help, is a "gross violation of human rights." Maybe you should also petition and push for help on the…
Solid stuff right here!
If I know that by jumping off of a bridge I will get hurt but I still jump, it is the bridge that is at fault. Brilliant logic on your side!
It is a valid point. But his skepticism is still warranted. Theranos was also masquerading as very scientific and was full of laurels. No difference! The undercurrent is this: "do not dare to express doubts on this…
So you want to not test people in English but in some vague universal language?! What would that be: "equality of outcome"? Propaganda?!
Did not catch it but where you one of the guys pointing out how wrong Theranos seemed to be? No? Then you are just virtue signaling in a SJW kind of way.
What's wrong with him expressing his skepticism?! And what makes you entitled to express harsh opinions?! Theranos was also looking at only tiny amounts of blood drawn from a finger prick. And everyone was on that…