It's possible that can’t actually prove that the keys were destroyed was the only legally relevant part of your testimony.
The goal of expert testimony is not to find the best technical solution. The goal is to adjudicate a dispute. So yes, objective qualifications trump subjective ones, and that shouldn't be surprising or disappointing.…
Yeah, the junior dev analogy misses on the core capabilities. The ability to spit out syntactically correct blocks of code in a second or two is a massive win, even if it requires careful review.
Maybe managers like the author are the problem. Startup founders who cash in, join Google, and are unpleasantly surprised to find that they are now just another middle manager who founded some startup nobody's heard of…
Why should Google risk their brand reputation in this way? The majority of their users probably have never heard of ChatGPT. They just know Google as the thing that gives them factual information. Google have something…
It's possible that can’t actually prove that the keys were destroyed was the only legally relevant part of your testimony.
The goal of expert testimony is not to find the best technical solution. The goal is to adjudicate a dispute. So yes, objective qualifications trump subjective ones, and that shouldn't be surprising or disappointing.…
Yeah, the junior dev analogy misses on the core capabilities. The ability to spit out syntactically correct blocks of code in a second or two is a massive win, even if it requires careful review.
Maybe managers like the author are the problem. Startup founders who cash in, join Google, and are unpleasantly surprised to find that they are now just another middle manager who founded some startup nobody's heard of…
Why should Google risk their brand reputation in this way? The majority of their users probably have never heard of ChatGPT. They just know Google as the thing that gives them factual information. Google have something…