[dead]
Why, specifically, do you think that is relevant in this context? Is it not ok to stop giving money to the bully threatening to punch you in the face before his fist connects?
It’s a shit company with a shit “product” run by shitty people aligned against Canadian sovereignty. Was this a serious question, or just boring contrarianism?
Why does “infinitely duplicatable” mean “I can have it for free because I want it”? What a stupid, childish value system. What thoughtless, vapid, bong-circle tripe.
I’ve started trying to guess how many top-level comments will be from people who don’t know anything about the study but have read a lot of erowid or whatever, acting like study experts and thinking “correlation is not…
> The kind of people you imagine, who can live full-time off writing, are responsible for a vanishingly small amount of the books that appear today So it’s ok to take what they produced without paying for it? What a…
I did not say they “made it their life’s mission” - you made that up. I said they devoted their life to it - given the numbers I hear about working hours at Meta, they literally do just that.
I think your final statement outright negates the prior one. You cannot devote your working life to making teenage girls depressed and teenage boys angry and not be evil. You just think they wear nice masks when they’re…
> Since Reddit itself is entirely text-based, it remains accessible and efficient, and appending site:reddit.com is still the best way to make Google search queries return anything approaching useful. This is nonsense,…
> The article is very clear that the issue arose in 2021 “Sometime around 2023, the barrier at Panama failed” And further text suggesting a fairly normal incursion in ‘21 that didn’t become a major issue until much…
> If AI was beneficial, no one would profitize it What? How does that follow?
> And no, there's no simple solution to this problem. The notion that something like "Medicare for All" would solve the problem is a total fantasy, disconnected from actual US healthcare economics. Any real solution…
> As successful as Obamacare has been it didn't really do much to lower the cost of healthcare It dramatically lowered the cost to consumers. Further, conflating overall healthcare spend with the portion of spend tied…
> please leave a downvote to indicate I caused you emotional distress. How deeply puerile.
> the only definition that is relevant in this context is the one held by the author of the earlier comment. This is absolute nonsense. We use common language to refer to common things in understandable ways in order to…
> You make enough money to pay for your own food, housing, and transportation in full, with enough buffer for emergencies, without needing to borrow a cent So you're saying I'm in poverty because I couldn't buy my house…
What specific point are you trying to make, here? Do you think a news organization should not be acquiring tech tools? Do you think that state-funded journalism matters, in this context, or do you just think those are…
"I'm going to take this box razor and make some really deep cuts around the middle of my face because my tech sector is too good and that's actually a bad thing because $foreigners."
What does "free" have to do with anything?
How many “average C-levels” have you talked to? What, specifically, do you think that actually means? Do you think the average CMO and CTO are identical, and have identical profiles in this case? Or are you just…
Eh, it’s less hysterical than the ever-pervasive belief among junior devs that they are the smartest people in the room and that all managers everywhere are dumb. Though I understand that gets social validation from…
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
Why, specifically, do you think that is relevant in this context? Is it not ok to stop giving money to the bully threatening to punch you in the face before his fist connects?
It’s a shit company with a shit “product” run by shitty people aligned against Canadian sovereignty. Was this a serious question, or just boring contrarianism?
Why does “infinitely duplicatable” mean “I can have it for free because I want it”? What a stupid, childish value system. What thoughtless, vapid, bong-circle tripe.
I’ve started trying to guess how many top-level comments will be from people who don’t know anything about the study but have read a lot of erowid or whatever, acting like study experts and thinking “correlation is not…
> The kind of people you imagine, who can live full-time off writing, are responsible for a vanishingly small amount of the books that appear today So it’s ok to take what they produced without paying for it? What a…
[dead]
I did not say they “made it their life’s mission” - you made that up. I said they devoted their life to it - given the numbers I hear about working hours at Meta, they literally do just that.
I think your final statement outright negates the prior one. You cannot devote your working life to making teenage girls depressed and teenage boys angry and not be evil. You just think they wear nice masks when they’re…
> Since Reddit itself is entirely text-based, it remains accessible and efficient, and appending site:reddit.com is still the best way to make Google search queries return anything approaching useful. This is nonsense,…
> The article is very clear that the issue arose in 2021 “Sometime around 2023, the barrier at Panama failed” And further text suggesting a fairly normal incursion in ‘21 that didn’t become a major issue until much…
> If AI was beneficial, no one would profitize it What? How does that follow?
> And no, there's no simple solution to this problem. The notion that something like "Medicare for All" would solve the problem is a total fantasy, disconnected from actual US healthcare economics. Any real solution…
> As successful as Obamacare has been it didn't really do much to lower the cost of healthcare It dramatically lowered the cost to consumers. Further, conflating overall healthcare spend with the portion of spend tied…
> please leave a downvote to indicate I caused you emotional distress. How deeply puerile.
> the only definition that is relevant in this context is the one held by the author of the earlier comment. This is absolute nonsense. We use common language to refer to common things in understandable ways in order to…
> You make enough money to pay for your own food, housing, and transportation in full, with enough buffer for emergencies, without needing to borrow a cent So you're saying I'm in poverty because I couldn't buy my house…
What specific point are you trying to make, here? Do you think a news organization should not be acquiring tech tools? Do you think that state-funded journalism matters, in this context, or do you just think those are…
"I'm going to take this box razor and make some really deep cuts around the middle of my face because my tech sector is too good and that's actually a bad thing because $foreigners."
What does "free" have to do with anything?
How many “average C-levels” have you talked to? What, specifically, do you think that actually means? Do you think the average CMO and CTO are identical, and have identical profiles in this case? Or are you just…
Eh, it’s less hysterical than the ever-pervasive belief among junior devs that they are the smartest people in the room and that all managers everywhere are dumb. Though I understand that gets social validation from…