I know this is HN and we’re not supposed to laugh, but this gave me a smile.
I wish there was an article on the oral history of comic chat.
I agree, it’s dumb. I never call those things popovers (is that a regional term?) so the whole time the word was a bit jarring. Also, at first I thought this was a riff on combovers, and imagined some weird male Medusa…
It randomizes slices of the sample and begins to play the slices in the random order. Meanwhile it begins the bubble sort algorithm at a pace that matches the tempo, sorting the slices into their chronological order.…
Simpler in the short run, but creates tech debt I think.
Seems appropriate here: https://genius.com/Moondog-enough-about-human-rights-lyrics In other words, why do we have to make something a person in order to give it rights?
Reminds me of the lawsuit brought against South Park by Brownmark Films over the recreation of their infamous video, also done in a faithful “side by side” manner. Interesting that the courts decided the opposite in…
I know this is HN and we’re not supposed to laugh, but this gave me a smile.
I wish there was an article on the oral history of comic chat.
I agree, it’s dumb. I never call those things popovers (is that a regional term?) so the whole time the word was a bit jarring. Also, at first I thought this was a riff on combovers, and imagined some weird male Medusa…
It randomizes slices of the sample and begins to play the slices in the random order. Meanwhile it begins the bubble sort algorithm at a pace that matches the tempo, sorting the slices into their chronological order.…
Simpler in the short run, but creates tech debt I think.
Seems appropriate here: https://genius.com/Moondog-enough-about-human-rights-lyrics In other words, why do we have to make something a person in order to give it rights?
Reminds me of the lawsuit brought against South Park by Brownmark Films over the recreation of their infamous video, also done in a faithful “side by side” manner. Interesting that the courts decided the opposite in…