Of course sexual materials of all kinds will stimulate some people. This isn't an argument though, it's just an observation. Pedophiles often have no access to materials but get turned on by their own fantasies.…
I think you missed the point. You can't know the full truth, because they are lying.
I'm saying what's arousing is subjective. No one tries to ban videos of someone getting beans poured on their head because it's consensual and there is no one getting hurt. But it is weird. An AI image of a naked child…
They cherry pick financial data to make themselves look healthier than they are, which is all you need to know.
They said they have $72 BILLION dollars in note depreciation and you believed that?
Regulations can't save them. Everyone will just use open weights.
Meetings make people feel like they have accomplished something
Comedy of errors
I learned about people who get aroused from other people getting food dumped on them. Sounds weird, but it's a real thing. It's called sploshing.
No no, you misunderstand. If a photo generated of me killing someone is used to convict me of a killing that didn't happen
I think you're being overly emotional and haven't addressed any of my points. You just doubled down and said it's child porn again when I've stated to you a couple times that if the porn contains no child, it can't be…
Expected to be treated as such until it's found out they aren't, right? Like once the cop finds out the gun isn't real, he retracts the charges for arms trafficking. Right?
You've combined two crimes into one. Robbing a bank with anything is armed robbery. My analogy is apt. If I get pulled over with an airsoft identical to an AK47 and charged with trafficking illegal firearms, I think you…
Some materials aren't designed thus yet produce sexual feelings anyway. Some materials produced to generate sexual feelings produce disgust instead. This reasoning is why we have always seriously questioned the banning…
March Andreessen will go wherever he can to do whatever it is he does
It's actually a good point though. If CSAM generated AI images are a crime even when there is no victim, then so are AI generated murder images.
Materials don't "produce" sexual thoughts and feelings, people experience those things. Sexual thoughts and feelings are also not a crime (yet).
You're just making more criminals this way. It's the same as saying air rifles that are indistinguishable from fully automatic weapons should be treated as fully automatic weapons. No?
That's quite a mental pretzel you've worked your way into. While we're at it let's just assume everyone is guilty that way we catch all the criminals
My apologies, I didn't see that
They actually produce weak outputs with extremely high effort
More often than it's worth most of the time
Or you have extremely simple taxes
It has very little to do with lag time on tax policy
I can attest to this. It's so odd that a technology can solve a millennium math problem but completely messes up pretty basic financial calculations.
Of course sexual materials of all kinds will stimulate some people. This isn't an argument though, it's just an observation. Pedophiles often have no access to materials but get turned on by their own fantasies.…
I think you missed the point. You can't know the full truth, because they are lying.
I'm saying what's arousing is subjective. No one tries to ban videos of someone getting beans poured on their head because it's consensual and there is no one getting hurt. But it is weird. An AI image of a naked child…
They cherry pick financial data to make themselves look healthier than they are, which is all you need to know.
They said they have $72 BILLION dollars in note depreciation and you believed that?
Regulations can't save them. Everyone will just use open weights.
Meetings make people feel like they have accomplished something
Comedy of errors
I learned about people who get aroused from other people getting food dumped on them. Sounds weird, but it's a real thing. It's called sploshing.
No no, you misunderstand. If a photo generated of me killing someone is used to convict me of a killing that didn't happen
I think you're being overly emotional and haven't addressed any of my points. You just doubled down and said it's child porn again when I've stated to you a couple times that if the porn contains no child, it can't be…
Expected to be treated as such until it's found out they aren't, right? Like once the cop finds out the gun isn't real, he retracts the charges for arms trafficking. Right?
You've combined two crimes into one. Robbing a bank with anything is armed robbery. My analogy is apt. If I get pulled over with an airsoft identical to an AK47 and charged with trafficking illegal firearms, I think you…
Some materials aren't designed thus yet produce sexual feelings anyway. Some materials produced to generate sexual feelings produce disgust instead. This reasoning is why we have always seriously questioned the banning…
March Andreessen will go wherever he can to do whatever it is he does
It's actually a good point though. If CSAM generated AI images are a crime even when there is no victim, then so are AI generated murder images.
Materials don't "produce" sexual thoughts and feelings, people experience those things. Sexual thoughts and feelings are also not a crime (yet).
You're just making more criminals this way. It's the same as saying air rifles that are indistinguishable from fully automatic weapons should be treated as fully automatic weapons. No?
That's quite a mental pretzel you've worked your way into. While we're at it let's just assume everyone is guilty that way we catch all the criminals
My apologies, I didn't see that
They actually produce weak outputs with extremely high effort
More often than it's worth most of the time
Or you have extremely simple taxes
It has very little to do with lag time on tax policy
I can attest to this. It's so odd that a technology can solve a millennium math problem but completely messes up pretty basic financial calculations.