I've used that style in 3 different companies over the last 10 years and I assumed the technique was ubiquitous. This just goes to show the standard deviation in engineering culture is high. There are some large bodies…
I apologize for the wall of text above, autobiography, and the sloppy questions. The repo documentation is very comprehensive about the language >>features<< and tool chain. I was hoping to get a little more clarity on…
This looks awesome! I think it might benefit from additional context and selling of the solution. I am probably adjacent to the target audience and I am struggling to grasp the scope of this. I think this might be HUGE…
I love the concept and see the value for refactoring. There is tremendous value in knowing that two implementations are run-time equivalent. I just wanted to share for others that there is a configuration language call…
I've used that style in 3 different companies over the last 10 years and I assumed the technique was ubiquitous. This just goes to show the standard deviation in engineering culture is high. There are some large bodies…
I apologize for the wall of text above, autobiography, and the sloppy questions. The repo documentation is very comprehensive about the language >>features<< and tool chain. I was hoping to get a little more clarity on…
This looks awesome! I think it might benefit from additional context and selling of the solution. I am probably adjacent to the target audience and I am struggling to grasp the scope of this. I think this might be HUGE…
I love the concept and see the value for refactoring. There is tremendous value in knowing that two implementations are run-time equivalent. I just wanted to share for others that there is a configuration language call…