Yeah, it clearly does. Lot of sweating collars.
Just a quick reminder to any potential felons in finance/crypto/corporate settings. If you decide to rob billions from the public, we'll let you out in about a decade as long as you don't beat someone up in prison. Just…
What a travesty of American justice. He'll be out in 12-13 years and will jet off to the mansion he bought for his parents in the Bahamas with his customer's money. You just know the smug felon has a huge BC wallet…
[flagged]
Don't spare too much of a thought for SBF. He won't go to the same prison you will.
This might be the most out of touch comment I've ever read, to the point where it genuinely looks like sarcasm mocking someone who would think like that. Apologies if so.
Good.
>I really don't like this--opt-out never works because the scale advantages are backwards. It places the burden in the wrong place. The aggregators should have to get opt-in. >Look at YouTube. Because of "opt-out", lots…
Content creators and publishers are also the primary ones who are using generative AI. They aren't a united monolith against generative AI.
This is what people on the "this is copyright infringement" side don't understand. Even if it somehow is copyright infringement by the standards of today's law, those laws will inevitably change in the near future.…
>Where generative AI ingests copyrighted works in order to work and bases its output on it, then it is copyright infringement This is an absurd standard. Is it copyright infringement when a human "ingests" copyrighted…
Yeah, it clearly does. Lot of sweating collars.
Just a quick reminder to any potential felons in finance/crypto/corporate settings. If you decide to rob billions from the public, we'll let you out in about a decade as long as you don't beat someone up in prison. Just…
What a travesty of American justice. He'll be out in 12-13 years and will jet off to the mansion he bought for his parents in the Bahamas with his customer's money. You just know the smug felon has a huge BC wallet…
[flagged]
Don't spare too much of a thought for SBF. He won't go to the same prison you will.
This might be the most out of touch comment I've ever read, to the point where it genuinely looks like sarcasm mocking someone who would think like that. Apologies if so.
Good.
>I really don't like this--opt-out never works because the scale advantages are backwards. It places the burden in the wrong place. The aggregators should have to get opt-in. >Look at YouTube. Because of "opt-out", lots…
Content creators and publishers are also the primary ones who are using generative AI. They aren't a united monolith against generative AI.
This is what people on the "this is copyright infringement" side don't understand. Even if it somehow is copyright infringement by the standards of today's law, those laws will inevitably change in the near future.…
>Where generative AI ingests copyrighted works in order to work and bases its output on it, then it is copyright infringement This is an absurd standard. Is it copyright infringement when a human "ingests" copyrighted…