> cats can trust and respect? I think you're doing the reverse of anthropomorphizing - assuming that because humans have an experience, then that experience must be unique to humans. Cats have all kinds of trust…
I'm going to disagree with you on that first sentence. It's likely that cats can sense your superior attitude toward them. As a result, they avoid bond-forming behaviors that require trust and vulnerability and mutual…
The fallacy I see here is the assumption that today's hot topics will still be as relevant in 10 years and not (as I suspect) superseded by wholly different issues and problems.
Looking forward to seeing the Baader-Mainhof phenomenon on the front page later today or tomorrow.
People very concerned about this should spend some time reading ${opposing political group} social media. As you'll discover, people will believe what suits them. Veracity is of remarkably little interest to a…
It sounds like you're saying that what a company calls itself determines which ethical obligations apply to it. I can agree to an extent, but I suspect there's a different point here. Twitter, per its own website, is…
> It's pretty rational to focus more on the sites that have the most traffic when discussing bias, isn't it? I feel that if a person is making an argument from principle, then that principle should apply everywhere and…
It's hard to take this argument seriously when the only companies mentioned are left-leaning tech companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google. I suspect that the author's concern isn't censorship per se, but…
You're conflating right to receive a basic necessity with the right to distribute a non-necessity. You may have a right to receive water. But you don't have a right to pee in the water supply. Nor should the private…
> cats can trust and respect? I think you're doing the reverse of anthropomorphizing - assuming that because humans have an experience, then that experience must be unique to humans. Cats have all kinds of trust…
I'm going to disagree with you on that first sentence. It's likely that cats can sense your superior attitude toward them. As a result, they avoid bond-forming behaviors that require trust and vulnerability and mutual…
The fallacy I see here is the assumption that today's hot topics will still be as relevant in 10 years and not (as I suspect) superseded by wholly different issues and problems.
Looking forward to seeing the Baader-Mainhof phenomenon on the front page later today or tomorrow.
People very concerned about this should spend some time reading ${opposing political group} social media. As you'll discover, people will believe what suits them. Veracity is of remarkably little interest to a…
It sounds like you're saying that what a company calls itself determines which ethical obligations apply to it. I can agree to an extent, but I suspect there's a different point here. Twitter, per its own website, is…
> It's pretty rational to focus more on the sites that have the most traffic when discussing bias, isn't it? I feel that if a person is making an argument from principle, then that principle should apply everywhere and…
It's hard to take this argument seriously when the only companies mentioned are left-leaning tech companies such as Twitter, Facebook, and Google. I suspect that the author's concern isn't censorship per se, but…
You're conflating right to receive a basic necessity with the right to distribute a non-necessity. You may have a right to receive water. But you don't have a right to pee in the water supply. Nor should the private…