Reminds me of an old security incident at Spotify https://engineering.atspotify.com/2013/06/creative-usernames
There are two proposals. You seem to refer to the Google doc proposal that was linked to in the first message of the mailing list thread several months ago. The link on hackernews points to an answer by Google that was…
and if you have both: (A (vendor (B (C (vendor (D E))) D E))) C would pick D E in its C/vendor before D E in A/vendor before D E in $GOPATH/src ps. I have edited these comments about 5 times to get the parentheses…
Yes. That would work. However, I also believe this will work: (A (vendor (B (C (vendor (D E)))))). https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/74zjMON9glU/LjrVU...…
Reminds me of an old security incident at Spotify https://engineering.atspotify.com/2013/06/creative-usernames
There are two proposals. You seem to refer to the Google doc proposal that was linked to in the first message of the mailing list thread several months ago. The link on hackernews points to an answer by Google that was…
and if you have both: (A (vendor (B (C (vendor (D E))) D E))) C would pick D E in its C/vendor before D E in A/vendor before D E in $GOPATH/src ps. I have edited these comments about 5 times to get the parentheses…
Yes. That would work. However, I also believe this will work: (A (vendor (B (C (vendor (D E)))))). https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/74zjMON9glU/LjrVU...…