> Of course when you are the creator of Zig, that may feel quite unfair and you should highlight it. Then highlight that, don't repeatedly insult someone. If Andrew thinks the same kind of ai-assisted improvement would…
Python was being used as a teaching language at flagship universities in the mid 2000s.
It should be noted that 1. Proto2 isn't actually deprecated or anything and is still widely used and supported 2. https://protobuf.dev/editions/overview/ replace and improve on the versioning concept and basically…
This is exceedingly easy to explain: demand is way too high, and the pro/max plans are loss leaders. I've paid a total of $20 and in 10 days, my cost, according to Claude code's cost tracker is like $400, which actually…
There are edge cases where this fails, but `def parse(s): return json.loads('['+re.sub('([")])\s*(["(])','\g<1>,\g<2>',re.sub('[^()\s]+','"\g<0>"',s)).replace('(','[').replace(')',']')+']')` is a surprisingly robust…
This, does exist though: https://share.google/i89jxAZzBzJJBpOyR. Like I know someone who answers phones are a salon and gets annoyed when people use this thing.
> I gave the example of Apple and Google for a good reason. Because these big companies are selling products that don't even exist yet. I guess I'm curious what you mean by this, I don't particularly see either of those…
> They'll replace the battery only "in eligible locations and while battery supplies last. And if you aren't in an eligible location they'll pay you cash or give you a discount on a new phone. I'm really unclear what…
I do most of my development on a MacBook air and a Chromebook. The ~only thing I do from my local machine is ssh into a beefy workstation and use chrome.
I mean I guess anything is possible, but the Pixel 6 and 7 also are receiving 5+ years of updates, and those sure seem real so far.
Yes, they've since more than doubled the support lifetimes to seven years.
> aren't motivated to do crime due to suffering Good thing I never said that! > Oh, and the only solution is more welfare Nor that! I said that for many people crime is a rational approach to more prosperity. That…
There is a reason that crime goes up a ton when existing tools for survival disappear (e.g. disaster scenarios). When people have paths to prosperity, the need to do crime goes down. When the marginal value of crime is…
While it doesn't explain 100% of crime, this is just true. You change people's circumstances such that crime isn't rational, and they're less likely to do it.
I want to be clear, I agree. I have no objection to unique government contracts. I'm specifically curious about GPs position that a government contractor should be (ethically?) bound from putting contractual obligations…
> they shouldn't have some sneaky way to exert control over decision making using their products. why not, many companies have all sorts of rules you agree to when using their products, including many legal ("lawful")…
I think it's because it's easy to make annoying mistakes (still easy to fix with undo) with edit. And it gains relatively little over new+squash. Edit is a useful power-feature, but I think for a novice, "never use it,…
This also does not change th code. It is an advertisement to a linter-loke tool to take some action on the source code. Its most similar to linter directives which usually are comments.
> The reason it feels like a kludge is that "comments" are normally understood to be non-impactful. Is a source transformation that removes all comments valid? If comments have no impact per the spec, yes. But that's…
And in fact the law at issue doesn't even assign points.
Having read the order, it doesn't really justify the central claim, that these are criminal, and in my opinion a lot of the context cuts against that (the liability being only a fine and some other things).
Can someone link the order, I've searched heavily for it and it's not linked by an of the articles or findable easily.
The mentioned fines are $1-200, which is in the same range as parking tickets. I think the best argument is that license points are criminal in nature, but I don't really buy that.
Everything you've said applies to parking tickets too. You can't prove that the owner parked the vehicle. Tha owner is ultimately civily liable if the vehicle is parked in a way that it shouldn't be. Extending that same…
> In some ways the government bringing civil charges against you is rather bullshitty I think there are circumstances where this is true, but I don't think it's true in the general sense. And I really don't think red…
> Of course when you are the creator of Zig, that may feel quite unfair and you should highlight it. Then highlight that, don't repeatedly insult someone. If Andrew thinks the same kind of ai-assisted improvement would…
Python was being used as a teaching language at flagship universities in the mid 2000s.
It should be noted that 1. Proto2 isn't actually deprecated or anything and is still widely used and supported 2. https://protobuf.dev/editions/overview/ replace and improve on the versioning concept and basically…
This is exceedingly easy to explain: demand is way too high, and the pro/max plans are loss leaders. I've paid a total of $20 and in 10 days, my cost, according to Claude code's cost tracker is like $400, which actually…
There are edge cases where this fails, but `def parse(s): return json.loads('['+re.sub('([")])\s*(["(])','\g<1>,\g<2>',re.sub('[^()\s]+','"\g<0>"',s)).replace('(','[').replace(')',']')+']')` is a surprisingly robust…
This, does exist though: https://share.google/i89jxAZzBzJJBpOyR. Like I know someone who answers phones are a salon and gets annoyed when people use this thing.
> I gave the example of Apple and Google for a good reason. Because these big companies are selling products that don't even exist yet. I guess I'm curious what you mean by this, I don't particularly see either of those…
> They'll replace the battery only "in eligible locations and while battery supplies last. And if you aren't in an eligible location they'll pay you cash or give you a discount on a new phone. I'm really unclear what…
I do most of my development on a MacBook air and a Chromebook. The ~only thing I do from my local machine is ssh into a beefy workstation and use chrome.
I mean I guess anything is possible, but the Pixel 6 and 7 also are receiving 5+ years of updates, and those sure seem real so far.
Yes, they've since more than doubled the support lifetimes to seven years.
> aren't motivated to do crime due to suffering Good thing I never said that! > Oh, and the only solution is more welfare Nor that! I said that for many people crime is a rational approach to more prosperity. That…
There is a reason that crime goes up a ton when existing tools for survival disappear (e.g. disaster scenarios). When people have paths to prosperity, the need to do crime goes down. When the marginal value of crime is…
While it doesn't explain 100% of crime, this is just true. You change people's circumstances such that crime isn't rational, and they're less likely to do it.
I want to be clear, I agree. I have no objection to unique government contracts. I'm specifically curious about GPs position that a government contractor should be (ethically?) bound from putting contractual obligations…
> they shouldn't have some sneaky way to exert control over decision making using their products. why not, many companies have all sorts of rules you agree to when using their products, including many legal ("lawful")…
I think it's because it's easy to make annoying mistakes (still easy to fix with undo) with edit. And it gains relatively little over new+squash. Edit is a useful power-feature, but I think for a novice, "never use it,…
This also does not change th code. It is an advertisement to a linter-loke tool to take some action on the source code. Its most similar to linter directives which usually are comments.
> The reason it feels like a kludge is that "comments" are normally understood to be non-impactful. Is a source transformation that removes all comments valid? If comments have no impact per the spec, yes. But that's…
And in fact the law at issue doesn't even assign points.
Having read the order, it doesn't really justify the central claim, that these are criminal, and in my opinion a lot of the context cuts against that (the liability being only a fine and some other things).
Can someone link the order, I've searched heavily for it and it's not linked by an of the articles or findable easily.
The mentioned fines are $1-200, which is in the same range as parking tickets. I think the best argument is that license points are criminal in nature, but I don't really buy that.
Everything you've said applies to parking tickets too. You can't prove that the owner parked the vehicle. Tha owner is ultimately civily liable if the vehicle is parked in a way that it shouldn't be. Extending that same…
> In some ways the government bringing civil charges against you is rather bullshitty I think there are circumstances where this is true, but I don't think it's true in the general sense. And I really don't think red…