I think the unstable ground comment applies to all purely AI companies. Google's strategy right now seems great.
This is false. Other forms of tech were not designed to replace humans with some kind of successor species, as they're trying to do here. Other tech was developed as a productivity boost, and for jobs it may have…
Exactly. I saw them using things from 2025... AI sorta sucked then and didn't really "take off" until that Opus drop in December or whatever it was.
That seems to be because Apple's AI division sucks. OpenAI came in 2018 and chatGPT 2.0 was already way better than anything Apple ever did.
Agent-shell.el for the CLI experience that's integrated with emacs. You can send things from emacs to your Claude code prompt and it will include the file and line numbers. There's also claude-code-ide.el that gives you…
Agent-shell.el and claude-code-ide.el Agent-shell is like the Claude code CLI. Claude-code-ide is like cursor with ghost completions/auto complete, chat, etc.
Emacs can give you all the vim key bindings. Vim can't do that.
Yes to some extent. When you attach to it, the default screen will still be scratch, but all your buffers are still open. There are some settings you can set to fix that, if it's burdensome.
Emacs --daemon once and then attach to it with emacsclient.
I don't understand what this means. How does claude-code-ide support or need a terminal like ghostel?
Also, if a slash command is missing, that's because the model's ACP client doesn't implement it: https://github.com/xenodium/agent-shell#why-doesnt-agent-she...
C-c C-v to change the model or M-x agent-shell-set-session-model
When on the agent shell buffer, do C-c C-v with the latest agent-shell to change the model
Anthropic scrapped their sdk billing thing
Emacs evil-mode gives you vim bindings.
Why not use agent-shell? It makes the whole experience great. Also claude-code-ide.el. try these
GPT 5.5 regularly got things correct where opus 4.8 got things wrong. Just today, it was launching an executable and putting the environments after the launch. It should have been Env1=val env2=val ./executable .... But…
>The projections, which were reviewed by The Wall Street Journal No, they're just projections of profitability
Did you read it? It just said AI assisted with the process. So did the Internet. AI didn't come up with the solution or even the idea. It simply helped prune the search space, which is valuable, but not worth the…
They already fold proteins with simulations. Just because people are using it doesn't mean it's a net good. Lots of people use social media and that's just rotting brains and making people far more polarized than they…
They haven't done humanity a favor at all. The innovation that these LLMs have produced has been small. A few fun math theorems where the answer was gleaned from a pattern in the training data. Great,.but it doesn't…
They're not really losing ground to Anthropic. 5.5 was a bit better than 4.8. Fable was good, and was a jump over 4.8, but only incremental over 5.5. Anthropic is also likely losing money, right?
SpaceX also wants to put data centers in space. That's the big market for SpaceX and how it ties into AI.
Signs point to them not caring.
They certainly can restrict technology that is deemed to be a national security risk.
I think the unstable ground comment applies to all purely AI companies. Google's strategy right now seems great.
This is false. Other forms of tech were not designed to replace humans with some kind of successor species, as they're trying to do here. Other tech was developed as a productivity boost, and for jobs it may have…
Exactly. I saw them using things from 2025... AI sorta sucked then and didn't really "take off" until that Opus drop in December or whatever it was.
That seems to be because Apple's AI division sucks. OpenAI came in 2018 and chatGPT 2.0 was already way better than anything Apple ever did.
Agent-shell.el for the CLI experience that's integrated with emacs. You can send things from emacs to your Claude code prompt and it will include the file and line numbers. There's also claude-code-ide.el that gives you…
Agent-shell.el and claude-code-ide.el Agent-shell is like the Claude code CLI. Claude-code-ide is like cursor with ghost completions/auto complete, chat, etc.
Emacs can give you all the vim key bindings. Vim can't do that.
Yes to some extent. When you attach to it, the default screen will still be scratch, but all your buffers are still open. There are some settings you can set to fix that, if it's burdensome.
Emacs --daemon once and then attach to it with emacsclient.
I don't understand what this means. How does claude-code-ide support or need a terminal like ghostel?
Also, if a slash command is missing, that's because the model's ACP client doesn't implement it: https://github.com/xenodium/agent-shell#why-doesnt-agent-she...
C-c C-v to change the model or M-x agent-shell-set-session-model
When on the agent shell buffer, do C-c C-v with the latest agent-shell to change the model
Anthropic scrapped their sdk billing thing
Emacs evil-mode gives you vim bindings.
Why not use agent-shell? It makes the whole experience great. Also claude-code-ide.el. try these
GPT 5.5 regularly got things correct where opus 4.8 got things wrong. Just today, it was launching an executable and putting the environments after the launch. It should have been Env1=val env2=val ./executable .... But…
>The projections, which were reviewed by The Wall Street Journal No, they're just projections of profitability
Did you read it? It just said AI assisted with the process. So did the Internet. AI didn't come up with the solution or even the idea. It simply helped prune the search space, which is valuable, but not worth the…
They already fold proteins with simulations. Just because people are using it doesn't mean it's a net good. Lots of people use social media and that's just rotting brains and making people far more polarized than they…
They haven't done humanity a favor at all. The innovation that these LLMs have produced has been small. A few fun math theorems where the answer was gleaned from a pattern in the training data. Great,.but it doesn't…
They're not really losing ground to Anthropic. 5.5 was a bit better than 4.8. Fable was good, and was a jump over 4.8, but only incremental over 5.5. Anthropic is also likely losing money, right?
SpaceX also wants to put data centers in space. That's the big market for SpaceX and how it ties into AI.
Signs point to them not caring.
They certainly can restrict technology that is deemed to be a national security risk.