You seem to be presupposing that all, or much of the C/C++ written today will follow best practices and be written by "expert" programers. A portion will, perhaps even a substantial portion, but I'd be willing to wager…
Have you read the following article? https://gradha.github.io/articles/2015/02/goodbye-nim-and-go... I'm curious about your thoughts on it being that the author speaks about some areas you're currently talking about.
> The number of compiler bugs is a bit scary. This is actually one of the things that keeps turning me away each time I try Nim. All software has bugs, got it, but in my mind a language nearing 1.0 should squash some of…
You seem to be presupposing that all, or much of the C/C++ written today will follow best practices and be written by "expert" programers. A portion will, perhaps even a substantial portion, but I'd be willing to wager…
Have you read the following article? https://gradha.github.io/articles/2015/02/goodbye-nim-and-go... I'm curious about your thoughts on it being that the author speaks about some areas you're currently talking about.
> The number of compiler bugs is a bit scary. This is actually one of the things that keeps turning me away each time I try Nim. All software has bugs, got it, but in my mind a language nearing 1.0 should squash some of…