No. Correlation is nonlocal, causality is not.
'free will' is unfortunate name. If randomness causes something instead of deterministic prosess, how is that free will? 'random choise loophole' does not sound so grand.
Mathematical modelling is better, because it's precise. Limits and scope are more obvious. It's easier to both criticize and explore ideas with math.
No. Correlation is nonlocal, causality is not.
'free will' is unfortunate name. If randomness causes something instead of deterministic prosess, how is that free will? 'random choise loophole' does not sound so grand.
Mathematical modelling is better, because it's precise. Limits and scope are more obvious. It's easier to both criticize and explore ideas with math.