Also, http only. Tell me you are a site from the before time without telling me you are a site from the before time.
Reminds me of this classic: http://vanilla-js.com/
Is anyone else getting sick of paywall articles being posted here? It just seems so very counter to the spirit of this place. Maybe it’s just me.
Looks cool. I am personally looking for more reasons to drop jQuery rather than more reasons to depend on it though. As an aside, I did the swipe to see the menu (I'm on mobile) but I am having hard time making the menu…
I'm not certain that one would necessarily need/want to take a another stab a "rewriting" core code here. If they are leaning on an interface, which it appears as such (EncryptorInterface), and have managed to avoid…
I did aim to clarify things in one of my responses below. It wasn't my intent to suggest that the author should necessarily be the one making a PR. My main point is that contribution and improvement should be encouraged…
It definitely is open source insofar as it being a public repository that accepts contributions. However, the disclaimer at the top of the repo does seem to suggest that free offerings might be scooped up and put to…
I am willing to accept that other variables might be involved here. I still think the general message of improving OSS is an important one.
Definitely not. That's why I said it I think it's great that this stuff is brought to the surface. I can see how what I wrote isn't entirely clear though. What I am trying to say is that it would be nice if the message…
I think it's great that stuff like this is brought to the surface, but it also troubles me that the author makes no mention of submitting a PR to improve the _open source_ code base... They seem more content to discuss…
Very cool. I just wish they called this "The Reading Rainbow" ;).
Also, http only. Tell me you are a site from the before time without telling me you are a site from the before time.
Reminds me of this classic: http://vanilla-js.com/
Is anyone else getting sick of paywall articles being posted here? It just seems so very counter to the spirit of this place. Maybe it’s just me.
Looks cool. I am personally looking for more reasons to drop jQuery rather than more reasons to depend on it though. As an aside, I did the swipe to see the menu (I'm on mobile) but I am having hard time making the menu…
I'm not certain that one would necessarily need/want to take a another stab a "rewriting" core code here. If they are leaning on an interface, which it appears as such (EncryptorInterface), and have managed to avoid…
I did aim to clarify things in one of my responses below. It wasn't my intent to suggest that the author should necessarily be the one making a PR. My main point is that contribution and improvement should be encouraged…
It definitely is open source insofar as it being a public repository that accepts contributions. However, the disclaimer at the top of the repo does seem to suggest that free offerings might be scooped up and put to…
I am willing to accept that other variables might be involved here. I still think the general message of improving OSS is an important one.
Definitely not. That's why I said it I think it's great that this stuff is brought to the surface. I can see how what I wrote isn't entirely clear though. What I am trying to say is that it would be nice if the message…
I think it's great that stuff like this is brought to the surface, but it also troubles me that the author makes no mention of submitting a PR to improve the _open source_ code base... They seem more content to discuss…
Very cool. I just wish they called this "The Reading Rainbow" ;).