They dismissed their particular issue as something that could not just be in their mind. Your quoted selection isn’t even in their post. It wasn’t a generalization in the way you think. Basic reading comprehension…
He/she is saying “It’s the FAA and $plane_manufacturers.”
A cottage service industry springs up which provides something of a foundation for other big corp players to work with? The area can attract people capable of working at a Google DC, and a local community to support…
There are a number of surveys and and stats gathered that argue most college grads are straight jacketed thinkers just like the majority They’re simply thinking about “the right stuff” to get higher paying jobs And a…
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/ERA-Activist-Jailed...
https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/20/s... Old men sermonizing the masses with little real reason
Thank you for assuming I’m ignorant of the process. “That’s exactly what we got.” Then why do the laws not reflect the wishes of the public? Majority opinion is to legalize all kinds of things legislators refuse to…
My intention was to call into question the statement “anyone can be President or a legislator.” Which you’ve agreed is nonsense. But yes let’s just disconnect it from context and polish the shit out of it
In a professional capacity they are. As individuals they are not, but even still they toe the line. While we revere the Founders for being outspoken of the status quo. Contemporary leadership relies on it. And note…
They question the correctness of decisions made by the US judiciary system from inside the system They decide if the inside of the box is working correctly in an undemocratic fashion, based upon their biases Not the…
It’s the same in the US The masses are bought in and ignore it Not one of the judges on the SC questions the correctness of the process They just regurgitate the things they’ve been taught and studied There is no more…
The second statement is false. How much a candidate raises has been correlated to ability to win. That eliminates anyone that can’t raise money. And Kavanaugh’s nomination casts doubt on the third statement. You can be…
There are customers and potential customers, that have called them out for it. So yeah.
“It’s just...” followed by a personal opinion is not a great justification
That’s too reductionist. Big corps are making huge profits while laying people off. Pursuit of an outcome alone isn’t enough. The process too must be in service to humanity at large to reach your conclusion. Too many…
They dismissed their particular issue as something that could not just be in their mind. Your quoted selection isn’t even in their post. It wasn’t a generalization in the way you think. Basic reading comprehension…
He/she is saying “It’s the FAA and $plane_manufacturers.”
A cottage service industry springs up which provides something of a foundation for other big corp players to work with? The area can attract people capable of working at a Google DC, and a local community to support…
There are a number of surveys and and stats gathered that argue most college grads are straight jacketed thinkers just like the majority They’re simply thinking about “the right stuff” to get higher paying jobs And a…
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/ERA-Activist-Jailed...
https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/20/s... Old men sermonizing the masses with little real reason
Thank you for assuming I’m ignorant of the process. “That’s exactly what we got.” Then why do the laws not reflect the wishes of the public? Majority opinion is to legalize all kinds of things legislators refuse to…
My intention was to call into question the statement “anyone can be President or a legislator.” Which you’ve agreed is nonsense. But yes let’s just disconnect it from context and polish the shit out of it
In a professional capacity they are. As individuals they are not, but even still they toe the line. While we revere the Founders for being outspoken of the status quo. Contemporary leadership relies on it. And note…
They question the correctness of decisions made by the US judiciary system from inside the system They decide if the inside of the box is working correctly in an undemocratic fashion, based upon their biases Not the…
It’s the same in the US The masses are bought in and ignore it Not one of the judges on the SC questions the correctness of the process They just regurgitate the things they’ve been taught and studied There is no more…
The second statement is false. How much a candidate raises has been correlated to ability to win. That eliminates anyone that can’t raise money. And Kavanaugh’s nomination casts doubt on the third statement. You can be…
There are customers and potential customers, that have called them out for it. So yeah.
“It’s just...” followed by a personal opinion is not a great justification
That’s too reductionist. Big corps are making huge profits while laying people off. Pursuit of an outcome alone isn’t enough. The process too must be in service to humanity at large to reach your conclusion. Too many…