There are kids under 18 who drink and plenty under 21 who drink. Still a very good idea to ban under 18 drinking, and not a terrible idea to ban under 21 drinking. You can do this for lots of rules and laws. So yeah,…
I don’t think “one can get around rules” is a very insightful thing to say, it’s just a truism.
They can force a by-election through various means, like a recall, for example.
> It would be very hard for people to condemn Kramnik for his cheating accusations all the while chess' top star Carlsen was on a bullying spree of his own against Niemann. Doesn’t seem that hard from seeing all the…
A big percentage of the top grandmasters skip high school and almost none of them have went to college. They are “smart” in that they have the potential intelligence to learn that stuff, as demonstrated by them having…
That’s quite a bit different from helping to kill people. Let’s not lump every ethical issue into one. And not conflate SEO sleaze with aiding murder.
Innovation is a pretty neutral concept. It doesn’t care about things like “what if my model learns from other models” as opposed to “what if my model learns from data I painfully curated” if the model progresses the…
Or if they want to do anything close to predicting what they will do in the future, like curious and interested humans tend to want to do.
> Are medical doctors less noble because they make massive salaries? Aren’t they? Would you say a doctor who works for no money is more noble? I would.
All about perspective! Plenty of romance stories that start out with stalking. (Though I guess from a social normative conversation pov, you would want to keep up the kayfabe).
If you define paying attention as funneling MSNBC straight into your brain 24/7, then sure.
I remember this vaccine being part of political discourse, so I everyone should be extremely skeptical of any news about it.
Ok, this is definitely a reading comprehension issue that you have that you should fix somehow.
I think it's still the case, especially during summer. People get busy and less interested in online bs once they graduate high school or college. I've noticed, someone mentions their age here and it skews younger…
Harris was a known to be bad with respect to the war issue, became very obviously bad when she started campaigning with Liz Cheney. Trump was less known bad, so that difference should certainly have swayed your decision.
Most of the posters in this website are teenagers or in their early twenties. Let’s not be delusional here, this is still the internet.
Still doesn't make sense. You were criticizing: "But once a technology like general-purpose humanoid robotics exists, it’s costs are only likely to decrease over time." But the point was currently general-purpose…
What kind of argument is this? "Banning murder sure did work. I can't think of a single person who did any of those things. /s". Bans would work for >90% of kids and that's good enough.
Those are all tech that almost everyone owns. Makes sense that mass production would reduce costs and then the cost reductions would go towards zero. For new technology that hasn't been mass produced, it's a completely…
Repeating true statements in a sarcastic manner doesn’t suddenly make them untrue statements.
You need to show at least some reference to that, or a name I can look up..
Yeah…technically possible but reckless beyond belief.
Protests by the masses and business negotiations are very different.
Yeah the maintainers don’t owe users nothing is a disgusting sentiment that doesn’t stand real scrutiny. There is a social contract here. If you want to be respected and get recognized as “tridge” or whatever your name…
X-Files was always part of the soft-disclosure.
There are kids under 18 who drink and plenty under 21 who drink. Still a very good idea to ban under 18 drinking, and not a terrible idea to ban under 21 drinking. You can do this for lots of rules and laws. So yeah,…
I don’t think “one can get around rules” is a very insightful thing to say, it’s just a truism.
They can force a by-election through various means, like a recall, for example.
> It would be very hard for people to condemn Kramnik for his cheating accusations all the while chess' top star Carlsen was on a bullying spree of his own against Niemann. Doesn’t seem that hard from seeing all the…
A big percentage of the top grandmasters skip high school and almost none of them have went to college. They are “smart” in that they have the potential intelligence to learn that stuff, as demonstrated by them having…
That’s quite a bit different from helping to kill people. Let’s not lump every ethical issue into one. And not conflate SEO sleaze with aiding murder.
Innovation is a pretty neutral concept. It doesn’t care about things like “what if my model learns from other models” as opposed to “what if my model learns from data I painfully curated” if the model progresses the…
Or if they want to do anything close to predicting what they will do in the future, like curious and interested humans tend to want to do.
> Are medical doctors less noble because they make massive salaries? Aren’t they? Would you say a doctor who works for no money is more noble? I would.
All about perspective! Plenty of romance stories that start out with stalking. (Though I guess from a social normative conversation pov, you would want to keep up the kayfabe).
If you define paying attention as funneling MSNBC straight into your brain 24/7, then sure.
I remember this vaccine being part of political discourse, so I everyone should be extremely skeptical of any news about it.
Ok, this is definitely a reading comprehension issue that you have that you should fix somehow.
I think it's still the case, especially during summer. People get busy and less interested in online bs once they graduate high school or college. I've noticed, someone mentions their age here and it skews younger…
Harris was a known to be bad with respect to the war issue, became very obviously bad when she started campaigning with Liz Cheney. Trump was less known bad, so that difference should certainly have swayed your decision.
Most of the posters in this website are teenagers or in their early twenties. Let’s not be delusional here, this is still the internet.
Still doesn't make sense. You were criticizing: "But once a technology like general-purpose humanoid robotics exists, it’s costs are only likely to decrease over time." But the point was currently general-purpose…
What kind of argument is this? "Banning murder sure did work. I can't think of a single person who did any of those things. /s". Bans would work for >90% of kids and that's good enough.
Those are all tech that almost everyone owns. Makes sense that mass production would reduce costs and then the cost reductions would go towards zero. For new technology that hasn't been mass produced, it's a completely…
Repeating true statements in a sarcastic manner doesn’t suddenly make them untrue statements.
You need to show at least some reference to that, or a name I can look up..
Yeah…technically possible but reckless beyond belief.
Protests by the masses and business negotiations are very different.
Yeah the maintainers don’t owe users nothing is a disgusting sentiment that doesn’t stand real scrutiny. There is a social contract here. If you want to be respected and get recognized as “tridge” or whatever your name…
X-Files was always part of the soft-disclosure.