If I regurgiate something I read in copyrighted book without proper license that also would be theft, no distinction there. I'm not distributing my brain, at least same (but probably more restrictive) should apply to…
> with or without finetuning? With, but it's still bonkers that it works so well >Also is there a practical motivation for creating them? You could get in-between model sizes (like 20b instead of 13b or 34b). Before…
Wait until you hear about frankenmodels. You rip parts of one model (often attention heads) and transplant them in another and somehow that produces coherent results! Witchcraft https://huggingface.co/chargoddard
I assume it's because such large context takes lots of memory, so you might as well have smarter model if you are not gonna fit in small vram anyway
Mistral 7B ~ 8 GiB StableLM 3B ~4 GiB You could go even lower with smaller quantization if necessary. I personally wouldn't use anything smaller than 7B and Mistral already pushing it in coherence. Overall it depends on…
For what it's worth, I think OP has a point in showing inconsistencies in your logic
That's disingenuous. You provided link to a legal framework, but not any use of it. Your source doesn't even mention a single delivery under this act. > Can you provide a source for your statement that these were…
> US isn't donating weapons to Ukraine, it's leasing them Could you kindly support your statement with the source? AFAIK most aid provided to Ukraine is not under lend-lease but donated to them
IIRC temperature is proportional to velocity squared so increase in simulation speed will result in squared increase in temperature. But even if we account for that we are not dealing with ideal gas in real world, there…
> So it’s completely subjective to you No? My prediction holds even if I didn't exist. > not anywhere near the testable physics that I was looking for. And now you are moving the goalpost.
Sure! It's just a classification of events that each person has. Testible prediction? Socially close people will have similar classifications as opposed to randomly chosen ones (I will leave defining metric space over…
GPL restricts only developers. As an end user restrictions don't even apply to you
Nothing changes, it is still a violation
> western Europe or the US. Why would we care about anyone not in the richest countries. It's not like they need security by default to not become another botnet and DDoS Europe or US businesses. I would like to see you…
Make it so decoding feasible only using some consumer hardware not usually found in servers, but omnipresent on consumer devices. GPU for example
If you buy from reseller they have no way to correlate payment details to search queries. With subscription, however, service provider have your payment details and knows everything about your queries so it can build a…
You could sell tokens that get used up after each search or expire after certain amount of time since first use. Browser extension could store tokens and provide them to website as needed in random order. Tokens could…
They do actually restrict issuer in most cases. Linus can't just strip Linux of other developers parts because they are tightly interconnected. He could relicense 30 year old version of Linux, but it would be useless
Patents also preserve knowledge in publicly accessible and well documented form. Without patents the only option to recoup investment in R&D would be to make innovations a trade secrets. This will lead to frequent…
Sure it is, you brain is not software though
I assume the code is a derivative work of training data because given different data code would be also different (neuron weights)
To build a browser you don't need a verbatim GPL code, so it's not a derivative work in the same sense copilot is. Stackoverflow on the other hand is much trickier question...
If the training set contains verbatim (A)GPL code does this mean that Copilot also should be distributed by Microsoft under GPL? Because without it Copilot (as it is distributed by Microsoft) couldn't be built, wouldn't…
Oh boy, that was a fun thread to read! Thanks for a laugh at GP expense
AGPL license clearly gives you the ability to freely link with whatever software you want. The only requirement is to share it with your customers. Following your logic it could be said that MIT licensed software could…
If I regurgiate something I read in copyrighted book without proper license that also would be theft, no distinction there. I'm not distributing my brain, at least same (but probably more restrictive) should apply to…
> with or without finetuning? With, but it's still bonkers that it works so well >Also is there a practical motivation for creating them? You could get in-between model sizes (like 20b instead of 13b or 34b). Before…
Wait until you hear about frankenmodels. You rip parts of one model (often attention heads) and transplant them in another and somehow that produces coherent results! Witchcraft https://huggingface.co/chargoddard
I assume it's because such large context takes lots of memory, so you might as well have smarter model if you are not gonna fit in small vram anyway
Mistral 7B ~ 8 GiB StableLM 3B ~4 GiB You could go even lower with smaller quantization if necessary. I personally wouldn't use anything smaller than 7B and Mistral already pushing it in coherence. Overall it depends on…
For what it's worth, I think OP has a point in showing inconsistencies in your logic
That's disingenuous. You provided link to a legal framework, but not any use of it. Your source doesn't even mention a single delivery under this act. > Can you provide a source for your statement that these were…
> US isn't donating weapons to Ukraine, it's leasing them Could you kindly support your statement with the source? AFAIK most aid provided to Ukraine is not under lend-lease but donated to them
IIRC temperature is proportional to velocity squared so increase in simulation speed will result in squared increase in temperature. But even if we account for that we are not dealing with ideal gas in real world, there…
> So it’s completely subjective to you No? My prediction holds even if I didn't exist. > not anywhere near the testable physics that I was looking for. And now you are moving the goalpost.
Sure! It's just a classification of events that each person has. Testible prediction? Socially close people will have similar classifications as opposed to randomly chosen ones (I will leave defining metric space over…
GPL restricts only developers. As an end user restrictions don't even apply to you
Nothing changes, it is still a violation
> western Europe or the US. Why would we care about anyone not in the richest countries. It's not like they need security by default to not become another botnet and DDoS Europe or US businesses. I would like to see you…
Make it so decoding feasible only using some consumer hardware not usually found in servers, but omnipresent on consumer devices. GPU for example
If you buy from reseller they have no way to correlate payment details to search queries. With subscription, however, service provider have your payment details and knows everything about your queries so it can build a…
You could sell tokens that get used up after each search or expire after certain amount of time since first use. Browser extension could store tokens and provide them to website as needed in random order. Tokens could…
They do actually restrict issuer in most cases. Linus can't just strip Linux of other developers parts because they are tightly interconnected. He could relicense 30 year old version of Linux, but it would be useless
Patents also preserve knowledge in publicly accessible and well documented form. Without patents the only option to recoup investment in R&D would be to make innovations a trade secrets. This will lead to frequent…
Sure it is, you brain is not software though
I assume the code is a derivative work of training data because given different data code would be also different (neuron weights)
To build a browser you don't need a verbatim GPL code, so it's not a derivative work in the same sense copilot is. Stackoverflow on the other hand is much trickier question...
If the training set contains verbatim (A)GPL code does this mean that Copilot also should be distributed by Microsoft under GPL? Because without it Copilot (as it is distributed by Microsoft) couldn't be built, wouldn't…
Oh boy, that was a fun thread to read! Thanks for a laugh at GP expense
AGPL license clearly gives you the ability to freely link with whatever software you want. The only requirement is to share it with your customers. Following your logic it could be said that MIT licensed software could…