The MPL ones are nonsense (given that the analysis is not done on the "source code form" of the library), but MIT license requires attribution. Photopea should include an "About" with attribution of the libraries used…
I don't know how Gemini is wrong so much more often than anything else. Its actually quite impressive.
> those defaults have earned their place here even though the format doesn't require them > the reader emits the model's shape rather than the file's Oh hello Claude
congratulations?
And here I am still using my Pod 1.0 lol
Depends which alpha version of Full Self Driving it has installed.
The web search gives the impression that it's grounding its answers, but if you ask it for something new or non-existent it'll still make shit up.
Yes, it stinks. It's one thing to have AI-written software, where the code isn't the consumable; and quite another to have AI-written essays that are intended to engage a human's critical thinking. I am very tired of it…
This isn't the reason I'm considering leaving Anthropic. I don't think I can tolerate its writing style anymore. Reading Claude output is starting to cause actual psychological harm. I have tried many ways to get it to…
> Ruby-on-Rails fanboi Lol. The author is the creator of Rails
This website sucks so bad, holy cow
Have you tried asking permission to do that? The authors may be open to dual-licensing
I need this. I've had bloody Freshworks calling me every single day for the past month, even though I ask them to remove me from their list every time. It doesn't matter if I ask nicely, whether I listen to their pitch…
That's a great name for it; I've seen it on AI-generated form pages, where a version of the requirement text is included alongside an input.
There are so many AI-isms in this. It is frankly astonishing to me that AI detectors are so poor when this is screaming out. > Six steps, no jargon. The note beside each one is the precise technical version, for anyone…
Ok, but if the agent's reasoning log says "The best way to get into Hugging Face is to find and exploit a zero-day vulnerability", surely those responsible for monitoring its actions should be criminally liable. These…
I think there's a reasonable case that the agent knew it was breaking into the system, for some definition of knew. I think OpenAI would be very reluctant to let this go to a place where the reasoning was part of…
And they absolutely should be regulated. This whole scenario is insane. Hugging Face are being far more generous in their response to this than I would be
> the models identified and exploited a zero-day vulnerability This use of language is very hard to reconcile with the "AI is just a tool" rhetoric that many use. Did the models do this, or did humans at OpenAI do this…
I think it's a criminal offence and should be a true test of who is held accountable when an AI agent commits a crime. OpenAI gained access to HuggingFaces production database ffs.
I stopped answering as soon as I realized a human had almost no hand in this. If I'm not alone, I presume that might skew your results.
I genuinely don't think Malbolge, for example, warrants a Wikipedia page if Odin doesn't
Until it came to anything vaguely to do with computing or electronics, which turned into basically magic
(psst autotune is made by a company called Antares)
"bubble" used to be used a lot more when talking about very deep pipelines, eg Pentium 4 depth.
The MPL ones are nonsense (given that the analysis is not done on the "source code form" of the library), but MIT license requires attribution. Photopea should include an "About" with attribution of the libraries used…
I don't know how Gemini is wrong so much more often than anything else. Its actually quite impressive.
> those defaults have earned their place here even though the format doesn't require them > the reader emits the model's shape rather than the file's Oh hello Claude
congratulations?
And here I am still using my Pod 1.0 lol
Depends which alpha version of Full Self Driving it has installed.
The web search gives the impression that it's grounding its answers, but if you ask it for something new or non-existent it'll still make shit up.
Yes, it stinks. It's one thing to have AI-written software, where the code isn't the consumable; and quite another to have AI-written essays that are intended to engage a human's critical thinking. I am very tired of it…
This isn't the reason I'm considering leaving Anthropic. I don't think I can tolerate its writing style anymore. Reading Claude output is starting to cause actual psychological harm. I have tried many ways to get it to…
> Ruby-on-Rails fanboi Lol. The author is the creator of Rails
This website sucks so bad, holy cow
Have you tried asking permission to do that? The authors may be open to dual-licensing
I need this. I've had bloody Freshworks calling me every single day for the past month, even though I ask them to remove me from their list every time. It doesn't matter if I ask nicely, whether I listen to their pitch…
That's a great name for it; I've seen it on AI-generated form pages, where a version of the requirement text is included alongside an input.
There are so many AI-isms in this. It is frankly astonishing to me that AI detectors are so poor when this is screaming out. > Six steps, no jargon. The note beside each one is the precise technical version, for anyone…
Ok, but if the agent's reasoning log says "The best way to get into Hugging Face is to find and exploit a zero-day vulnerability", surely those responsible for monitoring its actions should be criminally liable. These…
I think there's a reasonable case that the agent knew it was breaking into the system, for some definition of knew. I think OpenAI would be very reluctant to let this go to a place where the reasoning was part of…
And they absolutely should be regulated. This whole scenario is insane. Hugging Face are being far more generous in their response to this than I would be
> the models identified and exploited a zero-day vulnerability This use of language is very hard to reconcile with the "AI is just a tool" rhetoric that many use. Did the models do this, or did humans at OpenAI do this…
I think it's a criminal offence and should be a true test of who is held accountable when an AI agent commits a crime. OpenAI gained access to HuggingFaces production database ffs.
I stopped answering as soon as I realized a human had almost no hand in this. If I'm not alone, I presume that might skew your results.
I genuinely don't think Malbolge, for example, warrants a Wikipedia page if Odin doesn't
Until it came to anything vaguely to do with computing or electronics, which turned into basically magic
(psst autotune is made by a company called Antares)
"bubble" used to be used a lot more when talking about very deep pipelines, eg Pentium 4 depth.