It's built in to MacOS. Settings > Accessibility > Pointer Control > Alternate Control Methods > Head pointer
For example: "out fox", "loan out", and "crossed out"?
Also, look at their competition. New Relic's product is so painful and broken that despite successfully winning deals with many large companies, they still manage to lose business to Datadog as their end users work…
Cool. I remember having to jump through hoops in order to get the behavior I wanted in Oracle many years ago: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/675398
"In essence, you can only make money if you are doing hardcore R&D. This strongly incentivizes the creation of new capabilities but also disincentivizes publication of CS research. "You see this in markets like…
Very cool. I noticed that all the write benchmarks in https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/benchmarking.html are for random writes. Is write throughput affected by highly-sequential writes (e.g. - time series) vs random…
It's built in to MacOS. Settings > Accessibility > Pointer Control > Alternate Control Methods > Head pointer
For example: "out fox", "loan out", and "crossed out"?
Also, look at their competition. New Relic's product is so painful and broken that despite successfully winning deals with many large companies, they still manage to lose business to Datadog as their end users work…
Cool. I remember having to jump through hoops in order to get the behavior I wanted in Oracle many years ago: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/675398
"In essence, you can only make money if you are doing hardcore R&D. This strongly incentivizes the creation of new capabilities but also disincentivizes publication of CS research. "You see this in markets like…
Very cool. I noticed that all the write benchmarks in https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/benchmarking.html are for random writes. Is write throughput affected by highly-sequential writes (e.g. - time series) vs random…