> It doesn't use segmented stacks so it doesn't achieve the M:N performance of Go Actually, if you use Tokio or similar approach, you achieve better performance than Go (no need to re-allocate stacks) while code is…
I dislike Go's error handling too. Rust solved this neatly with question mark operator (previously implemented as try!() macro).
> It doesn't use segmented stacks so it doesn't achieve the M:N performance of Go Actually, if you use Tokio or similar approach, you achieve better performance than Go (no need to re-allocate stacks) while code is…
I dislike Go's error handling too. Rust solved this neatly with question mark operator (previously implemented as try!() macro).