I'm sure that's exactly what happened, and Zoe Quinn would never lie, no sir.
Or... you could not pay your committee so they're not incentivized to find positive results.
> no evidence that anybody reviewed her after she slept with them > one appears to be with a reviewer Wat
Exactly, all we need to do is give women power over men and sexual harassment won't exist anymore.
I believe this study was done with purely an interest in the facts and not a political agenda.
Well now I'm confused, is that not what their talking about in this article?
Only black people museums can have black people things. Racist bullshit.
Did iOS get rid of the "turn off banner notifications," or whatever it's called, in settings?
Replied via email.
Well, I would have deleted my "rabid," "aggressive," and "unsubstantive" comments, but apparently you've decided your users don't deserve the right to retract statements when they get off topic.
Can I ask why I'm being singled out here? Edit: And why can't I post anymore?
No system is 100% efficient. What's your point?
When it comes to obesity the victim is to blame. >I think it'd be a lot more challenging for someone to be obese with the same caloric amount of avocados than cheetos, for example As I've said elsewhere, the fact that…
No one is saying calorie intake should be constant.
The fact that your body can change the number of calories it burn disproves nothing. For example, the more weight you lose the fewer calories you burn, thus your calorie intake must lower to sustain the same deficit.
That paper is defining a calorie as the chemical make up of a particular macronutrient. Which is wrong. A calorie is a unit of measure of energy. Plus, if something violated a law of thermodynamics, that law would have…
The change in internal energy is negligible. The only exception is medical disorder. If you want to lose weight and you are not, eat less. If the amount you eat goes below say 1200 calories and you're still not losing…
Either thermodynamics is wrong, or you are undisciplined. Which do you think is more likely?
It's not helpful because some food are more calorie dense than others? How does that make sense?
No wonder the robots decided to use us for batteries.
>Calories in, calories out is not the golden rule, and this has been scientifically proven false. No. If the laws of thermodynamics had been proven false, we would have heard of it.
>Am I really that much of an outlier? No. Most people just live. They go to work, they go home, they sleep, maybe have a few drinks on the weekends, but their lives are not driven by fear of some nebulous thing like…
>It must be just the very young crowd, that hasn't gotten completely sick of it by now Also the older crowd. My mother loves telling me what she saw on facebook. I'd be willing to bet it's just the millennial…
Yes, there is.
He excluded the countries that were already excluded under Obama's executive orders on immigration. This isn't new foreign policy, just a strengthened one.
I'm sure that's exactly what happened, and Zoe Quinn would never lie, no sir.
Or... you could not pay your committee so they're not incentivized to find positive results.
> no evidence that anybody reviewed her after she slept with them > one appears to be with a reviewer Wat
Exactly, all we need to do is give women power over men and sexual harassment won't exist anymore.
I believe this study was done with purely an interest in the facts and not a political agenda.
Well now I'm confused, is that not what their talking about in this article?
Only black people museums can have black people things. Racist bullshit.
Did iOS get rid of the "turn off banner notifications," or whatever it's called, in settings?
Replied via email.
Well, I would have deleted my "rabid," "aggressive," and "unsubstantive" comments, but apparently you've decided your users don't deserve the right to retract statements when they get off topic.
Can I ask why I'm being singled out here? Edit: And why can't I post anymore?
No system is 100% efficient. What's your point?
When it comes to obesity the victim is to blame. >I think it'd be a lot more challenging for someone to be obese with the same caloric amount of avocados than cheetos, for example As I've said elsewhere, the fact that…
No one is saying calorie intake should be constant.
The fact that your body can change the number of calories it burn disproves nothing. For example, the more weight you lose the fewer calories you burn, thus your calorie intake must lower to sustain the same deficit.
That paper is defining a calorie as the chemical make up of a particular macronutrient. Which is wrong. A calorie is a unit of measure of energy. Plus, if something violated a law of thermodynamics, that law would have…
The change in internal energy is negligible. The only exception is medical disorder. If you want to lose weight and you are not, eat less. If the amount you eat goes below say 1200 calories and you're still not losing…
Either thermodynamics is wrong, or you are undisciplined. Which do you think is more likely?
It's not helpful because some food are more calorie dense than others? How does that make sense?
No wonder the robots decided to use us for batteries.
>Calories in, calories out is not the golden rule, and this has been scientifically proven false. No. If the laws of thermodynamics had been proven false, we would have heard of it.
>Am I really that much of an outlier? No. Most people just live. They go to work, they go home, they sleep, maybe have a few drinks on the weekends, but their lives are not driven by fear of some nebulous thing like…
>It must be just the very young crowd, that hasn't gotten completely sick of it by now Also the older crowd. My mother loves telling me what she saw on facebook. I'd be willing to bet it's just the millennial…
Yes, there is.
He excluded the countries that were already excluded under Obama's executive orders on immigration. This isn't new foreign policy, just a strengthened one.