In particular I think you may press the fork button on the github repo as per github rules. However, you are not allowed to make any commits to this new repo.
There's a saying, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. An author might reasonably prefer 90% of people visit his site to 100% of people consuming the content indirectly.
This philosophy hands your content on a silver platter to ai companies, so they can rake in money while giving nothing back to the author.
I treat the hard to access part as an emergency supply for when I forget to buy more in time. So normally I will throw it in the trash.
I don't think so. Managing the relationships with the public and study participants is an important part of the ethics.
Who would sign up for your study? The diligent person already on truvada - would they risk getting placebo? No. Or the person too careless to take truvada? Would they go to the trouble of participating in a study for a…
That's where future markets come in. The producer won't get negative prices on shiny days. The consumer won't pay through the nose on rainy days. The marginal producer doesn't matter with a prenegotiated price. This…
Well let's not forget that the large amount of information they ingest also leads to a superhuman level of knowledge though I guess for certain kinds of agents that is not really needed anyway.
Very cool that it was able to generalise from small numbers to larger ones with such high accuracy.
I think either you misunderstand me or I misunderstand you. Unless I'm mistaken a web application firewall is for a corporation to protect their intranet and not applicable for a core router.
Lichess is open source and has a very clever custom pgn compression. They analyze the chess position and use various features to determine how likely various moves are, then use that distribution to encode the move.
How far could you get with a scheme like "if router.country.is_shady and ip.is_western: route.deny()"
Everything today has USB. The historians and collectors of the future will be able to read it no doubt. A typical computer, maybe not
Yes, but... if existing holders don't believe in the valuation they are free to become marginal sellers. (N.b. I'm personally staying away from meme stocks)
This kind of content should be put in some kind of vault with a sticker "do not open before Christmas year 2100" I just hope they soft-deleted it.
That's not quite right. Always defecting is game theoretically optimal. However, under realistic conditions, where many agents are predisposed to cooperate but some do not that's where a tit for tat strategy can work…
If I want to wash 100 dishes I'll take a dishwasher. But if I want a single dish washed followed by watering a single plant followed by taking out the trash I'll take Rosie. Humanoid robot has much more Jack of all…
Download all the emails from the server. Create a backup dump file from your email client. Encrypt that with any program you like. Upload to eg Google drive. Verify the backup and then delete all the server-side copies…
Am I missing something or does this not take the center-letter rule into account?
AI is a fun toy. Of course people want to play with it. It's like the <blink> era of html. It's not an appropriate use of the technology, it doesn't add value... but... it's fun.
I appreciate your response but I don't really agree. They say that likelihood can be multiplied by any scale factor or that it's only the comparative difference that matters, or we can make a little plot, but they don't…
Because it works well in practice. And to elaborate, usually when something works well in practice it's because it has multiple desirable properties - the one you "ask for", but also other ones you get for free. In this…
In particular I think you may press the fork button on the github repo as per github rules. However, you are not allowed to make any commits to this new repo.
There's a saying, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. An author might reasonably prefer 90% of people visit his site to 100% of people consuming the content indirectly.
This philosophy hands your content on a silver platter to ai companies, so they can rake in money while giving nothing back to the author.
I treat the hard to access part as an emergency supply for when I forget to buy more in time. So normally I will throw it in the trash.
I don't think so. Managing the relationships with the public and study participants is an important part of the ethics.
Who would sign up for your study? The diligent person already on truvada - would they risk getting placebo? No. Or the person too careless to take truvada? Would they go to the trouble of participating in a study for a…
That's where future markets come in. The producer won't get negative prices on shiny days. The consumer won't pay through the nose on rainy days. The marginal producer doesn't matter with a prenegotiated price. This…
Well let's not forget that the large amount of information they ingest also leads to a superhuman level of knowledge though I guess for certain kinds of agents that is not really needed anyway.
Very cool that it was able to generalise from small numbers to larger ones with such high accuracy.
I think either you misunderstand me or I misunderstand you. Unless I'm mistaken a web application firewall is for a corporation to protect their intranet and not applicable for a core router.
Lichess is open source and has a very clever custom pgn compression. They analyze the chess position and use various features to determine how likely various moves are, then use that distribution to encode the move.
How far could you get with a scheme like "if router.country.is_shady and ip.is_western: route.deny()"
Everything today has USB. The historians and collectors of the future will be able to read it no doubt. A typical computer, maybe not
Yes, but... if existing holders don't believe in the valuation they are free to become marginal sellers. (N.b. I'm personally staying away from meme stocks)
This kind of content should be put in some kind of vault with a sticker "do not open before Christmas year 2100" I just hope they soft-deleted it.
That's not quite right. Always defecting is game theoretically optimal. However, under realistic conditions, where many agents are predisposed to cooperate but some do not that's where a tit for tat strategy can work…
If I want to wash 100 dishes I'll take a dishwasher. But if I want a single dish washed followed by watering a single plant followed by taking out the trash I'll take Rosie. Humanoid robot has much more Jack of all…
Download all the emails from the server. Create a backup dump file from your email client. Encrypt that with any program you like. Upload to eg Google drive. Verify the backup and then delete all the server-side copies…
Am I missing something or does this not take the center-letter rule into account?
AI is a fun toy. Of course people want to play with it. It's like the <blink> era of html. It's not an appropriate use of the technology, it doesn't add value... but... it's fun.
I appreciate your response but I don't really agree. They say that likelihood can be multiplied by any scale factor or that it's only the comparative difference that matters, or we can make a little plot, but they don't…
Because it works well in practice. And to elaborate, usually when something works well in practice it's because it has multiple desirable properties - the one you "ask for", but also other ones you get for free. In this…