I think OP's point is that, if the attacker already has root, they haven't gained any new capabilities from the CVE. They could just do whatever they wanted much more directly. Therefore, the inherent risk seems fairly…
But they do that via things in their control. For example, banks that don't follow FATCA cannot access the US banking system. It's rare for the US to send law enforcement to banks that don't comply The UK would have…
He's the "doing ui in c to piss of react devs" guy, right?
Because human review is a serious bottleneck and optimizing something that isn't the bottleneck isn't helpful
Which makes sense. In a conversation about code, the most likely answer is often some comment about backwards compatibility. In a conversation about a legacy enterprise app, the most likely answer is often going…
I still think this is because, on a new release, it works on some prompts the previous ones did badly at, because new weights do well on a different set of prompts. Then after a few days you notice the prompts that it…
I'd put Kevlin Henney up there with him. His talk on 1968 alone is pretty amazing
Sure, but the new patterns are several years old at this point. Not adapting is a choice
So that you can name a section of code without polluting the namespace.
It's training data might have a ton of examples of people hurrying and screwing more after being yelled at
Yeah, but that capture is usually just hosted spark usage. The AI usage has mostly been getting it to explain error messages
> “The source described leading AI labs or their allies approaching the administration every 3-5 months with an idea to ban open-source models.” That's going to hit first amendment grounds pretty quick, the same way…
It does make it correct in the reality sense If someone says something happens and the code says something else, the code wins.
The article mentions that the "pranksterish" groups who took psychedelics weathered it just fine. They didn't have an expectation to disappoint. Irreverence seems to be just as good It does sound like the opposite a…
Give how default gcc and clang are, along with the recommendation to update the standard instead of gcc and clang, it sounds like the standard is noncompliant with standard C++ Standard in the sense of commonly used or…
whistles 3.3 kilopounds? That's a lot
Generally speaking, things that you sell (the legal term is commercial speech, iirc) is more able to be regulated by the government. The government can ban the sale of those things to minors, generally. So the category…
It would probably also be illegal for the government to mandate a paywall. The issue is not that age gates are illegal, but that the government forcing people to use age gates is illegal.
There's a big difference here, in the US anyways, neither alcohol nor nicotine have first amendment protections. Basically all content delivered over the US does. That's a much thornier legal issue
> It is not disingenuous, maybe a little loose on the 'meaning', but your definition is rather narrow The thing is that every other country does have what they're describing. > The Color Purple has been challenged many…
Ahh, more supplement. I must have misread as more absolute amount
Do they need more vitamin D? I thought they just needed more sun to get the same vitamin D
You're not wrong that a rationale is required. But the master knowing when to break the rules because of tacit knowledge without being able to explain it is a real effect
> Radioactive decay shows that a young earth could not exist This is one of the worst arguments against young earth creationism. You have to posit a being who can create the universe, but can't create already decayed…
> The problem we're seeing across many professions is AI output is not getting vetted by knowledgeable people The problem is that output sometimes take longer to verify than to create in the first place. That turns AI…
I think OP's point is that, if the attacker already has root, they haven't gained any new capabilities from the CVE. They could just do whatever they wanted much more directly. Therefore, the inherent risk seems fairly…
But they do that via things in their control. For example, banks that don't follow FATCA cannot access the US banking system. It's rare for the US to send law enforcement to banks that don't comply The UK would have…
He's the "doing ui in c to piss of react devs" guy, right?
Because human review is a serious bottleneck and optimizing something that isn't the bottleneck isn't helpful
Which makes sense. In a conversation about code, the most likely answer is often some comment about backwards compatibility. In a conversation about a legacy enterprise app, the most likely answer is often going…
I still think this is because, on a new release, it works on some prompts the previous ones did badly at, because new weights do well on a different set of prompts. Then after a few days you notice the prompts that it…
I'd put Kevlin Henney up there with him. His talk on 1968 alone is pretty amazing
Sure, but the new patterns are several years old at this point. Not adapting is a choice
So that you can name a section of code without polluting the namespace.
It's training data might have a ton of examples of people hurrying and screwing more after being yelled at
Yeah, but that capture is usually just hosted spark usage. The AI usage has mostly been getting it to explain error messages
> “The source described leading AI labs or their allies approaching the administration every 3-5 months with an idea to ban open-source models.” That's going to hit first amendment grounds pretty quick, the same way…
It does make it correct in the reality sense If someone says something happens and the code says something else, the code wins.
The article mentions that the "pranksterish" groups who took psychedelics weathered it just fine. They didn't have an expectation to disappoint. Irreverence seems to be just as good It does sound like the opposite a…
Give how default gcc and clang are, along with the recommendation to update the standard instead of gcc and clang, it sounds like the standard is noncompliant with standard C++ Standard in the sense of commonly used or…
whistles 3.3 kilopounds? That's a lot
Generally speaking, things that you sell (the legal term is commercial speech, iirc) is more able to be regulated by the government. The government can ban the sale of those things to minors, generally. So the category…
It would probably also be illegal for the government to mandate a paywall. The issue is not that age gates are illegal, but that the government forcing people to use age gates is illegal.
There's a big difference here, in the US anyways, neither alcohol nor nicotine have first amendment protections. Basically all content delivered over the US does. That's a much thornier legal issue
> It is not disingenuous, maybe a little loose on the 'meaning', but your definition is rather narrow The thing is that every other country does have what they're describing. > The Color Purple has been challenged many…
Ahh, more supplement. I must have misread as more absolute amount
Do they need more vitamin D? I thought they just needed more sun to get the same vitamin D
You're not wrong that a rationale is required. But the master knowing when to break the rules because of tacit knowledge without being able to explain it is a real effect
> Radioactive decay shows that a young earth could not exist This is one of the worst arguments against young earth creationism. You have to posit a being who can create the universe, but can't create already decayed…
> The problem we're seeing across many professions is AI output is not getting vetted by knowledgeable people The problem is that output sometimes take longer to verify than to create in the first place. That turns AI…