How come? It seems it is very analogous to water in a pipe. Let's say I have a 30 m long garden hose. The water in it moves (in the order of magnitude of) 10 m/s in it. If the water is turned off, and I hold my thumb at…
I recently got an apple phone never before having owned one. I was dismayed about the options for 2fa apps, that there seemed to not be any foss ones. I installed Raivo since it was at least source-available and had…
lim = 10**1000000 a, b = 1, 2 acc = 0 while a < lim: if not a & 1: acc += a a, b = b, (a + b) print("done", flush=True) print(acc) For a baseline this trivial python implementation does it in 34 ms for 10^10000 and 2m55…
Escaping shell arguments is still fighting self-erected bugstacles. Why run the sub process in a shell in the first place? Why make a string out of your argument list for the shell to parse it back to a list to finally…
How come? It seems it is very analogous to water in a pipe. Let's say I have a 30 m long garden hose. The water in it moves (in the order of magnitude of) 10 m/s in it. If the water is turned off, and I hold my thumb at…
I recently got an apple phone never before having owned one. I was dismayed about the options for 2fa apps, that there seemed to not be any foss ones. I installed Raivo since it was at least source-available and had…
lim = 10**1000000 a, b = 1, 2 acc = 0 while a < lim: if not a & 1: acc += a a, b = b, (a + b) print("done", flush=True) print(acc) For a baseline this trivial python implementation does it in 34 ms for 10^10000 and 2m55…
Escaping shell arguments is still fighting self-erected bugstacles. Why run the sub process in a shell in the first place? Why make a string out of your argument list for the shell to parse it back to a list to finally…