Since Ikea update the firmware of the trådlös units quite often and has security updates in the changelog I would guess... yes They also mentions improvement of stability and performance towards different protocols in…
Shouldn't the test instead be: const int * const <variable name> Haven't profiled it but would make more sense to have the pointer also be const instead of having a non const pointer as input?
Since Ikea update the firmware of the trådlös units quite often and has security updates in the changelog I would guess... yes They also mentions improvement of stability and performance towards different protocols in…
Shouldn't the test instead be: const int * const <variable name> Haven't profiled it but would make more sense to have the pointer also be const instead of having a non const pointer as input?