kmijyiyxfbklao
No user record in our sample, but kmijyiyxfbklao has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
No user record in our sample, but kmijyiyxfbklao has activity below (stories or comments). Likely we have partial data — the full bulk-load will fill profiles in.
How was it disproven by the New World? The countries that mixed (Latin America) are weaker than the country that didn't (USA)
How is 1500 years ago a short time frame? Yeah, people moved, but how many people in what amount of time is important. And places become more boring if the have the same migrants as every other place, not less boring.
> I've done that evaluation with LLMs and they're definitely not conscious. This is an important point to just make it a side comment like that. Tell us how we can evaluate if something is conscious.
You can always trick investors. For example all the overpromising Musk has done over the years. Also when you are that famous you can sell lower quality goods for a higher price that people will buy because they are…
Twitter seems to be more popular in reddit too https://old.reddit.com/domain/threads.com/top/ https://old.reddit.com/domain/x.com/top/
But there is a distinction we can make between flowers and wasps. If there is no distinction we can make between Schwartz and non-Schwartz, then we are susceptible to the sample problem with or without AI. And if there…
That's all good if you assume people can't be tricked (tricked into paying more, tricked into buying something they don't want, tricked into working harder). The tricked person ends up with less and Elon ends up with…
Well if that gets us LinkedIn, we should move as far away from that as possible, and not listen to the people who want real names everywhere.
No, it's important. People are allowed to discourage each other from buying a product that they consider subpar.
Not conservative (there's nothing traditional about this) or liberal, just surveillance authoritarianism.
Planning includes the prototype you build with AI.
This is as useful as doing physics with spherical cows.
The whole point is that mandating websites to require age verification is more authoritarian than people are pretending it is.
>Or if they're still a kid, they can have their privileges temporarily revoked. Since people are already talking about using the law instead of parenting this needs clarification. Are the parents the one that would…
It's purposefully undefined because it's a social concept, not an engineering one. And it's also subjective. You can tell because they use OpenClaw as an example of a tasteful project. I would put OpenClaw in the same…
I don't think it counts as counter-signaling if can call him out.
> 4. Myth: Immigrants will replace the population. > Reality: Newcomers quickly adopt the habits of their new country. Within one generation, immigrant birth rates drop to match everyone else’s. That doesn't address the…
Good. Being OK with authoritarianism because they are on your side is never good.
I'm OK with you re-editing the movie as you watch it, but you can't say you watched the same movie as other people that don't do that.
Yeah, I think that's why I don't find this superinteresting. It's more a viral social media thing, than an AI thing.
Since there are no humans involved, it's more like growing a tree. Sure it's good to know how trees grow, but not knowing about cells didn't stop thousands of years of agriculture.
If it's "Who is worse Google or LLMs?", I think I'll say Google is worse. The biggest issue I see with LLMs is needing to pay a subscription to tech companies to be able to use them.
Abandoning your children is not an extreme example. It's a situation that anyone that knows poverty is familiar with.
>They don't know I know, and they don't know that I think less of them, and I always will. lol, behavior like this is way more destructive to personal relationships than AI ever will be.
I think it's more comforting to think that you could've done nothing about your life being bad. It's so obvious that you need both good luck and hard work.