European labor regulation and European tax rates have nothing to do with each other. The former is about restrictions on how employers can treat employees. The latter is about funding a robust welfare state. For what…
> Because labor protection costs money Labor protection does not "cost money". It is a limit on the degree to which workers can be exploited.
> Because then the question arises: What if the current way of handling labor protection in the EU (as one of many components) leads to destroying yours and everyone elses standard of living, simply because it's…
I'd rather live in a society with strong labor protections than one that is "more innovative", whatever that means.
European labor regulation and European tax rates have nothing to do with each other. The former is about restrictions on how employers can treat employees. The latter is about funding a robust welfare state. For what…
> Because labor protection costs money Labor protection does not "cost money". It is a limit on the degree to which workers can be exploited.
> Because then the question arises: What if the current way of handling labor protection in the EU (as one of many components) leads to destroying yours and everyone elses standard of living, simply because it's…
I'd rather live in a society with strong labor protections than one that is "more innovative", whatever that means.